Costanza Falcidia

Background and Objectives: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have expanded the therapeutic options for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The possibility of dose modulation with abrocitinib (100 and 200 mg) and upadacitinib (15 and 30 mg), both selective JAK1 inhibitors, represents a potential clinical advantage, allowing dose escalation in cases of insufficient response and dose de-escalation in the setting of poor tolerability or during maintenance treatment. However, real-world data remain limited, and the rationale for dose adjustment is not always standardized. This study aimed to describe, using a real-world database, the frequency, timing, and reasons for dose modifications of these agents. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 212 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with abrocitinib (n = 47) or upadacitinib (n = 165). Dose adjustments, including dose escalation and dose de-escalation, were recorded together with their timing and clinical reasons. Results: In the abrocitinib group, 34/47 patients (72.3%) initiated treatment at 100 mg, whereas 13/47 patients (27.7%) started at 200 mg. Six patients (12.8%) underwent a dose adjustment. One patient (2.1%) switched from 200 to 100 mg because of complete AD remission and concomitant menstrual cycle alterations, whereas five patients (10.6%) underwent dose escalation from 100 to 200 mg because of incomplete disease control. Among the six abrocitinib-treated patients who underwent dose adjustment, achievement of IGA 0/1 after dose modification was documented in all cases. In the upadacitinib group, 93/165 patients (56.4%) started at 15 mg, whereas 72/165 patients (43.6%) started at 30 mg. Overall, 44/165 patients (26.7%) underwent at least one dose adjustment, accounting for a total of 50 dose modifications: 27 escalations from 15 to 30 mg and 23 de-escalations from 30 to 15 mg. Among patients initiating treatment at 15 mg, 23/93 patients (24.7%) increased the dose to 30 mg after a median of 33.1 weeks because of suboptimal disease control. Among those starting at 30 mg, 21/72 patients (29.2%) reduced the dose to 15 mg after a median of 44.3 weeks. Of these, 12/21 patients (57.1%) reduced the dose because of adverse events, including herpetic infections and acne, whereas the remaining patients de-escalated because of optimal disease control. Some patients underwent multiple dose modifications: four followed a 30→15→30 mg sequence, with re-escalation after 13.2 weeks because of suboptimal disease control, and two followed a 15→30→15 mg sequence, with dose reduction after approximately 26.7 weeks because of herpes zoster. Overall, 29/44 patients achieved IGA 0/1 within 16 weeks and 38/44 within 32 weeks after dose modification. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, dose adjustments of selective JAK1 inhibitors were frequently performed in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, particularly among those treated with upadacitinib. Dose escalation was mainly used to address suboptimal disease control, whereas dose de-escalation was performed in the setting of adverse events or optimal disease control. The availability of two dosing regimens may allow treatment intensity to be adapted to individual disease severity, response, and tolerability, supporting a personalized approach to AD management.

Background and Objectives: Oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have become an important therapeutic class in dermatology, with approved indications including atopic dermatitis and alopecia areata. Owing to their broad immunomodulatory effects and rapid onset of action, these agents are increasingly used off label for a variety of inflammatory skin disorders that are often refractory to standard therapies. The objective of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the published literature on the off-label dermatologic use of oral JAK inhibitors, summarizing clinical outcomes, safety profiles and treatment durations reported in real-world settings. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify case reports and case series describing off-label dermatologic use of baricitinib, abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and ritlecitinib. Extracted data included authorship and year, article type, treatment regimen, treatment duration and follow-up, prior systemic therapies, clinical outcomes, and reported adverse events. Results: A total of 136 articles were included, comprising 45 articles on abrocitinib (63 patients), 55 on upadacitinib (94 patients), 35 on baricitinib (45 patients), and 2 on ritlecitinib (2 patients). Across a wide spectrum of dermatological conditions, oral JAK inhibitors showed consistent clinical efficacy. Responses were frequently rapid and disease control was often maintained over several months of treatment. In many cases, dose reduction or treatment discontinuation did not lead to immediate relapse. Overall tolerability was favorable, with adverse events reported in a minority of patients and predominantly described as mild and transient. Conclusions: Although our data is limited to case-based literature, this review highlights the broad off-label therapeutic potential of oral JAK inhibitors in dermatology. Their rapid onset of action, sustained clinical responses, frequent maintenance of remission after dose tapering or discontinuation and generally acceptable safety profile support their consideration as treatment options in selected patients.

Background/Objectives: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin disease with an estimated global prevalence of 3%. Real-world studies have demonstrated that biologic therapies have transformed the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis by providing optimal disease control and a favorable safety profile. However, a new challenge lies in identifying those most likely to achieve an early and sustained response, defined as ‘super-responders’ (SRs). This is particularly relevant given recent evidence suggesting that IL-23 inhibitors may have long-term disease-modifying effects by acting on tissue-resident memory T cells. Identifying positive and negative baseline predictors associated with achieving SR status in patients treated with anti-IL-23 agents. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from the electronic medical records of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital between June 2021 and June 2025. A total of 611 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who were treated with risankizumab, guselkumab or tildrakizumab were included in the study. Clinical assessments were conducted at baseline and weeks 16, 28 and 52. SR status was defined as achieving a PASI score of ≤1 at week 16, with this score being maintained through weeks 28 and 52. Results: Of the 611 enrolled patients, 390 (63.8 %) achieved SR status. In multivariate logistic regression, disease duration ≤ 2 years was the strongest independent predictor (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.47, p = 0.025), followed by bio-naïve status (OR 1.53, p = 0.019). Obesity (OR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.45–1.13) and cardiometabolic comorbidities (OR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.63–1.38) were not significantly associated with response after adjustments. No serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations occurred during 52 weeks of follow-up. Conclusions: Shorter disease duration (≤2 years) and bio-naïve status were identified as independent predictors of SR status. Identifying these patients could inform the development of personalized treatment strategies, including dose optimization and extended dosing intervals.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory disease affecting children and adults. Upadacitinib and abrocitinib are selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitors approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Although their efficacy and safety are described in phase 3 clinical trials, real-world data are limited. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib and abrocitinib treatment in a real-life adult population with moderate-to-severe AD throughout an extended observation period. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted by analyzing data from the electronic records of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital from January 2023 to December 2024. Patients were administered either upadacitinib (15 or 30 mg) or abrocitinib (100 or 200 mg). Effectiveness was evaluated by using clinician-reported scores (Investigator Global Assessment [IGA] and Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI]) and patient-reported outcomes (peak pruritus numerical rating scale [PP-NRS]) at weeks 8, 16, 32 and 52. Statistical significance was set at a probability value (p-value) < 0.05. Adverse events were also collected. Results: In total, 129 patients were included in the study, and 84 of them reached 52 weeks. At week 52, the EASI 75, 90, and 100 responses were 88.9%, 70.8%, and 54.2% for upadacitinib, and 100%, 91.7%, and 75% for abrocitinib. An IGA score equal to 0 or 1 at 52 weeks was achieved by 84.7% of patients treated with upadacitinib and 100% of those receiving abrocitinib. A four-point reduction from baseline PP-NRS was reported by 86.1% for upadacitinib and by 83.3% of patients for abrocitinib after one year of follow-up. Conclusions: Our study showed comparable or even higher effectiveness outcomes in terms of EASI 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 at week 52 compared to phase-3 clinical trials, with no new safety concerns, supporting the real-world effectiveness of abrocitinib and upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic dermatological condition characterized by intensely pruritic nodules resulting from repeated scratching. Its pathogenesis involves neuroimmune dysregulation, inflammatory cytokines, and neural proliferation. Conventional treatments often provide limited relief, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. This narrative review explores emerging biologics and small molecules for PN treatment, assessing their mechanisms, efficacy, and safety. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant studies up to February 2025. Additionally, ongoing clinical trials were identified through a verified international website. The search terms included “prurigo nodularis”, “biologic treatments”, “monoclonal antibodies”, “small molecules”, and “JAK inhibitors”. Among new treatment options, dupilumab, an IL-4 receptor antagonist, and nemolizumab, an IL-31 receptor inhibitor, demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing pruritus and lesion severity in PN patients. Other promising monoclonal antibodies include vixarelimab (OSMRβ inhibitor) and barzolvolimab (KIT inhibitor). Small molecules such as JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib, povorcitinib) also show potential by modulating inflammatory pathways. Clinical trials highlight their efficacy, safety, and long-term benefits. Emerging biologics and small molecules represent a transformative approach for PN management, offering targeted therapies that address underlying immunological and neurological mechanisms. Ongoing research and long-term studies are crucial to optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.