William H. McAnally
Research Subjects
William H. McAnally has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jairo Diaz-Ramirez
Mississippi State University
4 shared publications - Zhiyong Duan
School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China
3 shared publications J. L. Martin
2 shared publications- Vladimir Jose Alarcon
Universidad Diego Portales
2 shared publications Bruce L. McCartney
US Army Corps of Engineers
1 shared publicationC. G. O'Hara
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 September 2026
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 152 (5)
Proposal for Navigation Engineering Graduate Education
Forum papers are thought-provoking opinion pieces or essays founded in fact, sometimes containing speculation, on a civil engineering topic of general interest and relevance to the readership of the journal. The views expressed in this Forum article do not necessarily reflect the views of ASCE or the Editorial Board of the journal.
- 1 September 2026
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 152 (5)
Proposal for Navigation Engineering Graduate Education
Forum papers are thought-provoking opinion pieces or essays founded in fact, sometimes containing speculation, on a civil engineering topic of general interest and relevance to the readership of the journal. The views expressed in this Forum article do not necessarily reflect the views of ASCE or the Editorial Board of the journal.
- 1 September 2025
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 151 (5)
Interaction between Storm Surge and Mississippi River Flood Flows
- 1 September 2025
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 151 (5)
Interaction between Storm Surge and Mississippi River Flood Flows
- 1 July 2025
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 151 (4)
Model Validation Must Be Done Right
- 1 July 2025
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 151 (4)
Model Validation Must Be Done Right
- 16 March 2013
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- p. 456-466
Cohesive Sediment Research at the Waterways Experiment Station
- 16 March 2013
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- p. 456-466
Cohesive Sediment Research at the Waterways Experiment Station
- Open Access
- 1 December 2012
- Published by Universidad Catolica de la Santisima Concepcion in Obras Y Proyectos
- No. 12,p. 42-56
Parameter uncertainty methods in evaluating a lumped hydrological model
Water resources modelers face the challenge of dealing with numerous uncertainties due to the lack of knowledge of the natural systems, numerical approaches used in modeling (equations, parameters, structures, solutions), and field data collected to set up and evaluate models. Propagation of parameter uncertainty into model results is a relevant topic in environmental hydrology. Uncertainty analyses improve assessment of hydrological modeling. There is a need in modern hydrology of developing and testing uncertainty analysis methods that support hydrological model evaluation. In this research the propagation of model parameter uncertainty into streamflow model results is evaluated. The Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency was evaluated using hydroenvironmental data from the Luxapallila Creek watershed located in Mississippi and Alabama, USA. The uncertainty bounds of model outputs were computed using the Monte Carlo simulation and Harr’s point estimation methods. Analysis of parameter uncertainty propagation on streamflow simulations from 12 HSPF parameters was accomplished using 5,000 Monte Carlo random samples and 24 Harr selected points for each selected parameter. The comparison showed that Harr’s method could be an appropriate initial indicator of parameter uncertainty propagation on streamflow simulations, particularly for hydrology models with several parameters.
- 1 December 2012
- Published by Universidad Catolica de la Santisima Concepcion in Obras Y Proyectos
- No. 12,p. 42-56
Open AccessParameter uncertainty methods in evaluating a lumped hydrological model
Water resources modelers face the challenge of dealing with numerous uncertainties due to the lack of knowledge of the natural systems, numerical approaches used in modeling (equations, parameters, structures, solutions), and field data collected to set up and evaluate models. Propagation of parameter uncertainty into model results is a relevant topic in environmental hydrology. Uncertainty analyses improve assessment of hydrological modeling. There is a need in modern hydrology of developing and testing uncertainty analysis methods that support hydrological model evaluation. In this research the propagation of model parameter uncertainty into streamflow model results is evaluated. The Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency was evaluated using hydroenvironmental data from the Luxapallila Creek watershed located in Mississippi and Alabama, USA. The uncertainty bounds of model outputs were computed using the Monte Carlo simulation and Harr’s point estimation methods. Analysis of parameter uncertainty propagation on streamflow simulations from 12 HSPF parameters was accomplished using 5,000 Monte Carlo random samples and 24 Harr selected points for each selected parameter. The comparison showed that Harr’s method could be an appropriate initial indicator of parameter uncertainty propagation on streamflow simulations, particularly for hydrology models with several parameters.
- 1 January 2012
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 589-598
Comparison of Two Hydrodynamic Models of Weeks Bay, Alabama
- 1 January 2012
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 589-598
Comparison of Two Hydrodynamic Models of Weeks Bay, Alabama
- 1 January 2009
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environmental Engineering Science
- Vol. 26 (1) , 155-162
Modeling Streamflow-Driven Gas-Liquid Transfer Rate
A streamflow-driven gas-liquid transfer rate model was developed. This model was developed in terms of total surface renewal rate and gas diffusion coefficient. The total surface renewal rate was considered to be the sum of the surface renewal rates caused by the turbulence from the air-water interface and that from the water-bed interface. A general mixing length formula and a vertical fluctuation velocity formula was developed to formulate the surface renewal rate. Predictions of this model show good agreements with the measurements in previous studies and the predictions of Churchill's, O'Connor-Dobbins', and Owens-Gibbs' formulae. It was indicated in some previous studies that the existing streamflow-driven gas-liquid transfer rate formulae have limited application ranges. The model developed in this study can be applied for all the normal ranges of flow velocity and water depth in natural rivers, which generalizes and simplifies the applications.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environmental Engineering Science
- Vol. 26 (1) , 155-162
Modeling Streamflow-Driven Gas-Liquid Transfer Rate
A streamflow-driven gas-liquid transfer rate model was developed. This model was developed in terms of total surface renewal rate and gas diffusion coefficient. The total surface renewal rate was considered to be the sum of the surface renewal rates caused by the turbulence from the air-water interface and that from the water-bed interface. A general mixing length formula and a vertical fluctuation velocity formula was developed to formulate the surface renewal rate. Predictions of this model show good agreements with the measurements in previous studies and the predictions of Churchill's, O'Connor-Dobbins', and Owens-Gibbs' formulae. It was indicated in some previous studies that the existing streamflow-driven gas-liquid transfer rate formulae have limited application ranges. The model developed in this study can be applied for all the normal ranges of flow velocity and water depth in natural rivers, which generalizes and simplifies the applications.
- 1 November 2008
- Published by Coastal Education and Research Foundation in Journal of Coastal Research
- Vol. 10052, 89-94
Sensitivity of the HSPF Model to Land Use/Land Cover Datasets
- 1 November 2008
- Published by Coastal Education and Research Foundation in Journal of Coastal Research
- Vol. 10052, 89-94
Sensitivity of the HSPF Model to Land Use/Land Cover Datasets