AGAdrian Eugen Gliga

Adrian Eugen Gliga

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Adrian Eugen Gliga has a total of 30 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Alba Alonso Adame

    Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Merelbeke, 9820, Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Alina Syp

    Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute, Pulawy, Lublin Voivodeship, 24-100, Poland

    1 shared publication
  • Claudia Consalvo

    Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems of the National Research Council, Porano TR, 05010, Italy

    1 shared publication
  • Deborah Lorenzoni

    Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems of the National Research Council, Porano TR, 05010, Italy

    1 shared publication
  • Enrico Petrangeli

    Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems of the National Research Council, Porano TR, 05010, Italy

    1 shared publication
  • Giuseppe Russo

    Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems of the National Research Council, Porano TR, 05010, Italy

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Feasibility and reliability of farmer-recorded plant diversity indicators in European grasslands

    by Tom Staton, Markus Wagner, Kate Farley, Adrian Gliga, Mignon Sandor, Laurence G. Smith, Lisa Norton

  • Open Access

    Analysing stakeholder perceptions in organic farming using fuzzy cognitive maps

    by Marco Ciolfi, Alba Alonso Adame, Lisa Arguile, Robert Borek, Claudia Consalvo, Michael Den Herder, Rowan Dumper-Pollard, Siavash Farahbakhsh, Adrian Eugen Gliga, Valerie Holzner, et al.

    Background In this study, we introduce the application of ensemble averages, a concept rooted in statistical mechanics, to the analysis of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs). This novel approach is employed to investigate stakeholder perceptions of the organic and sustainable food chain across Europe and identify leverage points for its improvement. The FCMs were constructed through workshops held in seven countries participating in the European project Foodlevers, using diverse methodologies to ensure comprehensive and regionally relevant data collection. Methods By leveraging ensemble averages, we aggregate the outcomes of FCMs initialised with random conditions, ensuring robust and stable representations of the systems under study. This approach allows us to mitigate the variability inherent in individual initialisations and highlight the underlying structure and dynamics of the maps. Through this analysis, we identify the key variables and their roles within each country’s food system, providing insights into the factors perceived as most critical by stakeholders for promoting sustainability and organic practices. Results Our findings reveal both commonalities and country-specific differences in the perceived leverage points, reflecting the diverse socio-economic and cultural contexts within Europe. The ensemble averaging method proved particularly effective in achieving consistent rankings of variables, enabling a clearer comparison across the countries. This methodological advancement enhances the utility of FCMs in multi-country studies, offering a reliable tool for analysing complex systems and informing policy interventions. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the systemic dynamics of the European organic food chain and provide actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders aiming to strengthen sustainable practices. Conclusion Our study highlights the potential of integrating statistical mechanics techniques with cognitive mapping methodologies to address pressing challenges in food systems research and beyond.