Taylor Baisey
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Taylor Baisey has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Elyssa Samayoa
1 shared publication- Gillian Rn Otway
From the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (MM, LWD); San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA (MM, LWD, HRS, DS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA (HRS); Department of Nursing, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA (LH, GO); Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (DS)
1 shared publication Isabel Cabrera
University of California, Berkeley
1 shared publication- Jane Caporiccio1 shared publication
- Jennifer Sowerwine
University of California, Berkeley
1 shared publication - Kelly Ray Knight
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 September 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Addiction Medicine
In-Hospital Substance Use: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Staff Experiences
Objectives: To understand patient and staff experiences with in-hospital substance use (IHSU) and develop recommendations to better support patients and staff navigating IHSU. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients engaging in and hospital staff responding to IHSU in the past year at a safety-net hospital in San Francisco, California, from July 2024 to August 2025. We used iterative thematic analysis to identify major themes. Results: Patients (n=19) were recruited from the community (84.2%) and hospital (15.8%). Most identified as men (73.7%), White (63.2%), and unhoused (57.9%); most used fentanyl during hospitalization (57.9%). Staff (n=21) included clinicians (28.6%), nurses (28.6%), nurse leaders (19.0%), administrators (14.3%), and other staff members (9.5%); primary work areas were administration (23.8%), the addiction consult team (19.0%), and medical-surgical departments (19.0%). We identified seven themes regarding patient and staff experiences: (1) IHSU helped patients endure hospitalization; (2) punitive responses exacerbated patient experiences of mistrust, stigma, and distress; (3) patient-centered responses improved patient and staff experiences; (4) staff were concerned for patient and staff safety; (5) nurses were concerned about personal liability; (6) nurses felt unheard in concerns; and (7) staff felt underprepared to respond to IHSU. Conclusions: IHSU helped patients avoid patient-directed discharge but distressed staff—especially nurses—due to a lack of training and support. To improve patient and staff experiences, hospitals can implement standardized addiction medicine training, proactive evidence-based inpatient addiction treatment, trauma-informed IHSU responses, and evidence-based patient-centered policies for responding to IHSU that support patients and staff.
- 16 September 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Addiction Medicine
Open AccessIn-Hospital Substance Use: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Staff Experiences
Objectives: To understand patient and staff experiences with in-hospital substance use (IHSU) and develop recommendations to better support patients and staff navigating IHSU. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients engaging in and hospital staff responding to IHSU in the past year at a safety-net hospital in San Francisco, California, from July 2024 to August 2025. We used iterative thematic analysis to identify major themes. Results: Patients (n=19) were recruited from the community (84.2%) and hospital (15.8%). Most identified as men (73.7%), White (63.2%), and unhoused (57.9%); most used fentanyl during hospitalization (57.9%). Staff (n=21) included clinicians (28.6%), nurses (28.6%), nurse leaders (19.0%), administrators (14.3%), and other staff members (9.5%); primary work areas were administration (23.8%), the addiction consult team (19.0%), and medical-surgical departments (19.0%). We identified seven themes regarding patient and staff experiences: (1) IHSU helped patients endure hospitalization; (2) punitive responses exacerbated patient experiences of mistrust, stigma, and distress; (3) patient-centered responses improved patient and staff experiences; (4) staff were concerned for patient and staff safety; (5) nurses were concerned about personal liability; (6) nurses felt unheard in concerns; and (7) staff felt underprepared to respond to IHSU. Conclusions: IHSU helped patients avoid patient-directed discharge but distressed staff—especially nurses—due to a lack of training and support. To improve patient and staff experiences, hospitals can implement standardized addiction medicine training, proactive evidence-based inpatient addiction treatment, trauma-informed IHSU responses, and evidence-based patient-centered policies for responding to IHSU that support patients and staff.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2025
- Published by Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems in Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
- Vol. 14 (2) , 1-30
Community-based compost distribution program's role in organic waste diversion and the circular food system
Nearly one-third of the entire U.S. food supply is sent to landfills. As food decomposes, it emits methane, a potent greenhouse gas that fuels global warming. To reduce greenhouse gas emissions and create a more circular food system, states across the country are mandating food waste diversion from landfills through several mechanisms, including composting. In 2016, California passed Senate Bill 1383 (SB-1383), which requires organic (including food) waste diversion from landfills in part by mandating municipal procurement of recycled organic waste products. To comply with SB-1383, the city of Albany, California, established a Compost Distribution Hub in April 2023 in partnership with an urban community farm to distribute free compost to the farm and the community. This paper investigates the successes, challenges, and initial impacts of the Compost Distribution Hub in meeting SB-1383 requirements and contributing to a circular food system, as well as a circular economy more broadly. Through 26 semi-structured interviews with implementing partners and community patrons and an analysis of the compost quality, we found the Compost Distribution Hub contributed to organic waste diversion requirements, provided additional social co-benefits, and contributed to the broader circular economy by recycling non-food organic waste. However, it did not contribute to a circular food system, as it sourced compost made from green waste rather than food waste. It also was unable to provide community education due to insufficient funds. To maximize community and circularity benefits, compost distribution programs must ensure that compost is sourced from food waste, incorporate community education, and dedicate funding for the educational efforts.
- 1 January 2025
- Published by Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems in Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
- Vol. 14 (2) , 1-30
Open AccessCommunity-based compost distribution program's role in organic waste diversion and the circular food system
Nearly one-third of the entire U.S. food supply is sent to landfills. As food decomposes, it emits methane, a potent greenhouse gas that fuels global warming. To reduce greenhouse gas emissions and create a more circular food system, states across the country are mandating food waste diversion from landfills through several mechanisms, including composting. In 2016, California passed Senate Bill 1383 (SB-1383), which requires organic (including food) waste diversion from landfills in part by mandating municipal procurement of recycled organic waste products. To comply with SB-1383, the city of Albany, California, established a Compost Distribution Hub in April 2023 in partnership with an urban community farm to distribute free compost to the farm and the community. This paper investigates the successes, challenges, and initial impacts of the Compost Distribution Hub in meeting SB-1383 requirements and contributing to a circular food system, as well as a circular economy more broadly. Through 26 semi-structured interviews with implementing partners and community patrons and an analysis of the compost quality, we found the Compost Distribution Hub contributed to organic waste diversion requirements, provided additional social co-benefits, and contributed to the broader circular economy by recycling non-food organic waste. However, it did not contribute to a circular food system, as it sourced compost made from green waste rather than food waste. It also was unable to provide community education due to insufficient funds. To maximize community and circularity benefits, compost distribution programs must ensure that compost is sourced from food waste, incorporate community education, and dedicate funding for the educational efforts.