Filiep J. Vanpoucke
Research Subjects
Filiep J. Vanpoucke has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aniket A. Saoji
Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
1 shared publication - Behnam Molaee-Ardekani
Cochlear Ltd
1 shared publication - David M. Landsberger
NYU Grossman School of Medicine 1 , New York, New York 10016
1 shared publication - Joerg Pesch
Cochlear Ltd., Advanced Innovation, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium
1 shared publication - Joscelyn R. K. Martin
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
1 shared publication - Madison K. Graham
Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 3-31
Cochlear Implant Development: From Early Concepts to Future Directions
- 1 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 3-31
Cochlear Implant Development: From Early Concepts to Future Directions
- Open Access
- 12 April 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Audiology Research
- Vol. 15 (2) , 41
Electrode Impedance Subcomponent Analysis in Cochlear Implant Patients with Rising or Fluctuating Electrode Impedances
Background/Objectives: Electrode impedance is crucial for optimizing cochlear implant (CI) stimulation and hearing outcomes. While typically stable, some patients experience unexplained impedance fluctuations. This study used electrode impedance subcomponent analysis to identify the subcomponents contributing to these impedance fluctuations. Methods: This study analyzed clinical electrode impedances and transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements in 10 CI patients with Nucleus devices (CI422, CI522, or CI622 electrode arrays) who exhibited fluctuating or rising electrode impedances. TIM measurements used a cathodic-leading biphasic pulse (110 CLs, 75 µs/phase, 7 µs interphase interval). Electrode impedances were determined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 75 µs, and subcomponents (access resistance [near-field/far-field] and polarization impedance [Warburg capacitance/Faraday resistance]) were calculated. Results: Both access resistance and polarization impedance changes contributed to impedance fluctuations. Large changes in near-field resistance compared to far-field resistance were associated with increased resistance to current flow closer to the surface of the electrode. The decreased double-layer capacitance and slightly increased Faraday resistance further suggested increased resistance to charge transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface. Conclusions: Electrode impedance subcomponent analysis reveals changes in the electrochemical reaction at the electrode surface that cause fluctuating or rising CI electrode impedances.
- 12 April 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Audiology Research
- Vol. 15 (2) , 41
Open AccessElectrode Impedance Subcomponent Analysis in Cochlear Implant Patients with Rising or Fluctuating Electrode Impedances
Background/Objectives: Electrode impedance is crucial for optimizing cochlear implant (CI) stimulation and hearing outcomes. While typically stable, some patients experience unexplained impedance fluctuations. This study used electrode impedance subcomponent analysis to identify the subcomponents contributing to these impedance fluctuations. Methods: This study analyzed clinical electrode impedances and transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements in 10 CI patients with Nucleus devices (CI422, CI522, or CI622 electrode arrays) who exhibited fluctuating or rising electrode impedances. TIM measurements used a cathodic-leading biphasic pulse (110 CLs, 75 µs/phase, 7 µs interphase interval). Electrode impedances were determined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 75 µs, and subcomponents (access resistance [near-field/far-field] and polarization impedance [Warburg capacitance/Faraday resistance]) were calculated. Results: Both access resistance and polarization impedance changes contributed to impedance fluctuations. Large changes in near-field resistance compared to far-field resistance were associated with increased resistance to current flow closer to the surface of the electrode. The decreased double-layer capacitance and slightly increased Faraday resistance further suggested increased resistance to charge transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface. Conclusions: Electrode impedance subcomponent analysis reveals changes in the electrochemical reaction at the electrode surface that cause fluctuating or rising CI electrode impedances.