Roxana Ioana Hodas
Research Subjects
Roxana Ioana Hodas has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Călin Pop
2nd Department, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine—Cluj Napoca, Str. Louis Pasteur Nr. 4, 400349 Cluj Napoca, Romania
2 shared publications - Andreea Pintilie
Department of Cardiology, “Constantin Opriş” Emergency County Hospital, 430031 Baia Mare, Romania
1 shared publication - Antoniu Octavian Petris
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115 Iași, Romania
1 shared publication - Camelia Alexandra Coadă
Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Ioan Ferenț
University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Tîrgu Mureș , Romania
1 shared publication - Mihai Lupu
Division of Physiology, Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 8 Victor Babeş Street, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (20) , 7424
Stress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis: From Diagnostic Challenges to Guideline-Endorsed Clinical Applications
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in industrialized countries. Stress echocardiography (SE), using either exercise or dobutamine protocols, has emerged as a critical tool to overcome limitations of resting echocardiography, refine risk stratification, and guide the timing of aortic valve replacement. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic role of SE in AS. Studies from all main databases (2000–2025) were systematically analyzed including prospective studies, consensus statements, and international guidelines. We highlight the physiological rationale, key prognostic markers, applications in asymptomatic severe and low-flow, low-gradient AS, and integration with multimodality imaging. SE is now guideline-endorsed for risk stratification in asymptomatic severe AS and the diagnosis of true severe versus pseudo-severe AS in low-flow, low-gradient disease. Future directions include advanced strain imaging, artificial intelligence, and broader adoption in the transcatheter era.
- 21 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (20) , 7424
Open AccessStress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis: From Diagnostic Challenges to Guideline-Endorsed Clinical Applications
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in industrialized countries. Stress echocardiography (SE), using either exercise or dobutamine protocols, has emerged as a critical tool to overcome limitations of resting echocardiography, refine risk stratification, and guide the timing of aortic valve replacement. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic role of SE in AS. Studies from all main databases (2000–2025) were systematically analyzed including prospective studies, consensus statements, and international guidelines. We highlight the physiological rationale, key prognostic markers, applications in asymptomatic severe and low-flow, low-gradient AS, and integration with multimodality imaging. SE is now guideline-endorsed for risk stratification in asymptomatic severe AS and the diagnosis of true severe versus pseudo-severe AS in low-flow, low-gradient disease. Future directions include advanced strain imaging, artificial intelligence, and broader adoption in the transcatheter era.
- Open Access
Factors Associated with Mortality Risk in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Post-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from a Regional Centre in Northwest Romania
Background and Objectives: ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), is a critical condition associated with high mortality rates. Identifying predictors of in-hospital mortality can enhance patient management and outcomes. Materials and Methods: This observational, retrospective case–control study included STEMI patients, both complicated and uncomplicated by CS. Additionally, demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory data and in-hospital mortality rates were analysed for STEMI patients with CS and those without CS. Results: This study included a total of 101 patients with STEMI, of whom 51 (50.5%) had STEMI without CS and 50 (49.5%) had STEMI with CS. No significant differences were observed in demographic characteristics or STEMI risk factors between the two groups. Emergency coronarography was performed in 90.1% of the patients, with successful thrombolysis achieved in 24.5%. Patients with CS exhibited a significantly higher mortality (52%) than those without CS (11.76%). Univariate analysis identified white blood cell counts, CK-MB, CK levels, elevated creatinine and uric acid levels and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as predictors of mortality. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LVEF and CK-MB were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI and CS. Each 1% increase in LVEF was associated with a reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.98; p = 0.018), while elevated CK-MB levels were linked to an increased mortality risk (HR = 1; 95% CI 1–1.01; p = 0.014). Conclusions: Reduced systolic function and elevated CK-MB levels are key predictors of in-hospital mortality and outcomes in STEMI patients with CS. These findings underscore the importance of early identification and support the development of targeted management strategies aimed at improving outcomes in this high-risk population.
Open AccessFactors Associated with Mortality Risk in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Post-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from a Regional Centre in Northwest Romania
Background and Objectives: ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), is a critical condition associated with high mortality rates. Identifying predictors of in-hospital mortality can enhance patient management and outcomes. Materials and Methods: This observational, retrospective case–control study included STEMI patients, both complicated and uncomplicated by CS. Additionally, demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory data and in-hospital mortality rates were analysed for STEMI patients with CS and those without CS. Results: This study included a total of 101 patients with STEMI, of whom 51 (50.5%) had STEMI without CS and 50 (49.5%) had STEMI with CS. No significant differences were observed in demographic characteristics or STEMI risk factors between the two groups. Emergency coronarography was performed in 90.1% of the patients, with successful thrombolysis achieved in 24.5%. Patients with CS exhibited a significantly higher mortality (52%) than those without CS (11.76%). Univariate analysis identified white blood cell counts, CK-MB, CK levels, elevated creatinine and uric acid levels and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as predictors of mortality. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LVEF and CK-MB were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI and CS. Each 1% increase in LVEF was associated with a reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.98; p = 0.018), while elevated CK-MB levels were linked to an increased mortality risk (HR = 1; 95% CI 1–1.01; p = 0.014). Conclusions: Reduced systolic function and elevated CK-MB levels are key predictors of in-hospital mortality and outcomes in STEMI patients with CS. These findings underscore the importance of early identification and support the development of targeted management strategies aimed at improving outcomes in this high-risk population.