Ivana Hrga

Accurate, high-resolution air quality data are crucial for understanding environmental health risks; however, the cost and complexity of maintaining dense, reference-grade monitoring networks remain a significant barrier. This study presents the first city-wide evaluation of next-generation air quality sensors in Zagreb, Croatia, involving 35 sensor locations, one local reference-grade station, and three national reference stations that measure PM₁₀ and NO₂. Sensor performance was evaluated against reference data under various meteorological and temporal conditions. To better understand sensor drift and measurement bias, we developed machine learning (ML) calibration models (XGBoost) using spatiotemporal features, ERA5 meteorological variables, and traffic proxy indicators. The models significantly improved accuracy, reducing the root mean squared error (RMSE) by up to 82%, with the greatest improvements observed during pollution peaks. A rolling Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) approach was introduced to track model degradation over time, revealing that recalibration was typically needed within 1–6 months. Our findings demonstrate that, with proper calibration and maintenance, sensor networks can serve as reliable and scalable tools for urban air quality monitoring, capable of supporting both public health assessments and informed decision-making.

Within the scope of “Eco Map of Zagreb” project, eight sensor sets (type AQMeshPod) were set up at an automatic measuring station at the Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health (IMROH) for comparison with reference methods for air quality measurement during 2018. This station is a city background station within the Zagreb network for air quality monitoring, where measurements of SO₂, CO, NO₂, O₃, PM₁₀ and PM_2.5, are performed using standardized methods accredited according to EN ISO/IEC 17025. This paper presents a comparison of pollutant mass concentrations determined by sensors with reference methods. The data were compared and filtered to remove outliers and handle deviations between the results obtained by sensors and reference methods, considering the different approaches to gas and PM data. A comparison of sensor results with the reference methods showed a large scattering of all gaseous pollutants while the comparison for PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 indicated a satisfactory low dispersion. The results of a regression analysis showed a significant seasonal dependence for all pollutants. Significant statistical differences between the reference methods and sensors for the whole year and in all seasons for all gas pollutants, as well as for PM₁₀, were observed, while for PM_2.5 statistical significance showed varying results.