Alessandro Ingenito
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Alessandro Ingenito has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alessandro von Gal
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication Dario Papa
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication- Emiliano Ricciardi
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca Lucca Italy
1 shared publication - Francesca Setti
MoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
1 shared publication - Francesca Simonelli
MoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
1 shared publication - Giacomo Handjaras
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 31 August 2025
- Published by Elsevier in NeuroImage
- Vol. 319, 121439
Neural representation of action features across sensory modalities: A multimodal fMRI study
- 31 August 2025
- Published by Elsevier in NeuroImage
- Vol. 319, 121439
Open AccessNeural representation of action features across sensory modalities: A multimodal fMRI study
- Open Access
- 23 April 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (5)
Relationship Between Depression and Neurodegeneration: Risk Factor, Prodrome, Consequence, or Something Else? A Scoping Review
Background: The link between depression and neurodegeneration is complex and unclear. It is debated whether depression is a risk factor, a prodrome, a consequence, or unrelated. Objectives: This review examines these possibilities to clarify their connection, focusing primarily on Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and other highly comorbid neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: Eligibility criteria: The studies included in this review focused on neurodegenerative diseases with high comorbidity with depression, published in peer-reviewed English-language journals, providing empirical evidence on the link between the two conditions or theoretical frameworks that point to other studies. Non-human studies and those irrelevant to this connection were excluded. Source of evidence: AI-supported tools identified relevant articles. Results: Most studies suggest depression may contribute to neurodegeneration, but clinical, neuroimaging, and longitudinal evidence also support its role as a prodrome or consequence, indicating a bidirectional relationship. Conclusions: Despite extensive research, the connection remains unclear, highlighting the need for further investigation into underlying mechanisms and interdependencies, focusing on longitudinal studies by examining causality.
- 23 April 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (5)
Open AccessRelationship Between Depression and Neurodegeneration: Risk Factor, Prodrome, Consequence, or Something Else? A Scoping Review
Background: The link between depression and neurodegeneration is complex and unclear. It is debated whether depression is a risk factor, a prodrome, a consequence, or unrelated. Objectives: This review examines these possibilities to clarify their connection, focusing primarily on Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and other highly comorbid neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: Eligibility criteria: The studies included in this review focused on neurodegenerative diseases with high comorbidity with depression, published in peer-reviewed English-language journals, providing empirical evidence on the link between the two conditions or theoretical frameworks that point to other studies. Non-human studies and those irrelevant to this connection were excluded. Source of evidence: AI-supported tools identified relevant articles. Results: Most studies suggest depression may contribute to neurodegeneration, but clinical, neuroimaging, and longitudinal evidence also support its role as a prodrome or consequence, indicating a bidirectional relationship. Conclusions: Despite extensive research, the connection remains unclear, highlighting the need for further investigation into underlying mechanisms and interdependencies, focusing on longitudinal studies by examining causality.