Gregory Firth
Gregory Firth has a total of 34 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daniel Christopher Perry
Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
3 shared publications - Joanna O'MAhoney
Surgical Interventions Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 shared publications - Loretta Davies
Surgical Interventions Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 shared publications - Tim Theologis
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 shared publications - Beth Fordham
Surgical Interventions Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 shared publications - Catherine Barry
Surgical Interventions Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 June 2025
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 6 (6) , 677-684
Development of a multicentre cohort study to understand the role of MRI and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute haematogenous bone and joint infection in children (the PIC Bone study)
Aims: Bone and joint infections (BJI) in children are rare but can be serious. Differentiating BJI from other conditions with similar symptoms is critical. Advanced imaging (ultrasound scans (USS) and MRI) is often required to confirm the diagnosis. The differing merits of imaging type and regional variation in access to advanced imaging can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and treatment variation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and USS for the investigation of BJI in children, and develop and validate prediction models to aid the diagnosis of BJI in children. A nested qualitative sub-study will explore acceptability of the imaging to children, parents, and health practitioners.Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort of children (aged < 16 years) with suspected diagnosis of BJI will be used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the two imaging methods and develop the prediction models. The models will be evaluated in a second cohort of prospectively recruited children. Diagnostic test accuracy will be estimated overall, and separately for children aged under and over five years. The prediction models will be fit using logistic regression, with candidate predictors chosen based on clinical plausibility and from a review of the literature. Continuous predictors will be examined for non-linearity with confirmed BJI using fractional polynomials. Multiple imputation will be used to replace missing values. Internal validation will be carried out using bootstrapping. Model performance will be assessed with discrimination and calibration.Discussion: Ethical approval for this study (registration: ISRCTN15471635) was granted (REC reference 23/WM/0027). Informed consent is being obtained from participants in the prospective cohort and the qualitative sub-study. Study findings will be published in an open access journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences. Relevant charities and associations are being engaged to promote awareness of the project.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(6):677–684.
- 10 June 2025
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 6 (6) , 677-684
Open AccessDevelopment of a multicentre cohort study to understand the role of MRI and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute haematogenous bone and joint infection in children (the PIC Bone study)
Aims: Bone and joint infections (BJI) in children are rare but can be serious. Differentiating BJI from other conditions with similar symptoms is critical. Advanced imaging (ultrasound scans (USS) and MRI) is often required to confirm the diagnosis. The differing merits of imaging type and regional variation in access to advanced imaging can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and treatment variation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and USS for the investigation of BJI in children, and develop and validate prediction models to aid the diagnosis of BJI in children. A nested qualitative sub-study will explore acceptability of the imaging to children, parents, and health practitioners.Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort of children (aged < 16 years) with suspected diagnosis of BJI will be used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the two imaging methods and develop the prediction models. The models will be evaluated in a second cohort of prospectively recruited children. Diagnostic test accuracy will be estimated overall, and separately for children aged under and over five years. The prediction models will be fit using logistic regression, with candidate predictors chosen based on clinical plausibility and from a review of the literature. Continuous predictors will be examined for non-linearity with confirmed BJI using fractional polynomials. Multiple imputation will be used to replace missing values. Internal validation will be carried out using bootstrapping. Model performance will be assessed with discrimination and calibration.Discussion: Ethical approval for this study (registration: ISRCTN15471635) was granted (REC reference 23/WM/0027). Informed consent is being obtained from participants in the prospective cohort and the qualitative sub-study. Study findings will be published in an open access journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences. Relevant charities and associations are being engaged to promote awareness of the project.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(6):677–684.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2025
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 6 (5) , 506-516
Clinical effectiveness of a child-specific dynamic stretching programme, compared to usual care, for ambulant children with spastic cerebral palsy (SPELL trial): a parallel group randomized controlled trial
Aims: Dynamic muscle stretching exercises are one of the interventions frequently prescribed by physiotherapists for children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, there is wide variability in the exercise regimes used and limited evidence of their effectiveness. The SPELL trial will assess the clinical effectiveness of an individually tailored dynamic stretching programme, compared to usual care for ambulant children with spastic CP.Methods: We are conducting a multicentre, two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial. We will recruit children aged four to 11 years with a diagnosis of spastic CP (bilateral or unilateral) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III who are able to comply with assessment procedures and exercise programme with or without support. Participants will be recruited from at least 12 UK NHS Trust physiotherapy and related services. Participants (n = 334) will be randomized (centralized computer-generated one:one allocation ratio) to either: 1) a dynamic stretching exercise programme, with six one-to-one physiotherapy sessions over 16 weeks; or 2) usual NHS care, with a single physiotherapy session and an assessment, and advice regarding self-management and exercise.Conclusion: The primary outcome is functional mobility measured using the child-/parent-reported Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) at six months. Secondary outcomes are: joint range of motion (Cerebral Palsy Integrated Pathway protocol) and motor function (timed up and go test) at six months; functional mobility (GOAL) at 12 months; independence (GOAL subdomain A); balance (GOAL subdomain A, B, D); pain and discomfort (GOAL subdomain C); health-related quality of life (youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y)); educational attendance; exercise adherence; and additional physiotherapy treatment at six and 12 months. The primary analysis will be intention to treat.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(5):506–516.
- 1 May 2025
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 6 (5) , 506-516
Open AccessClinical effectiveness of a child-specific dynamic stretching programme, compared to usual care, for ambulant children with spastic cerebral palsy (SPELL trial): a parallel group randomized controlled trial
Aims: Dynamic muscle stretching exercises are one of the interventions frequently prescribed by physiotherapists for children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, there is wide variability in the exercise regimes used and limited evidence of their effectiveness. The SPELL trial will assess the clinical effectiveness of an individually tailored dynamic stretching programme, compared to usual care for ambulant children with spastic CP.Methods: We are conducting a multicentre, two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial. We will recruit children aged four to 11 years with a diagnosis of spastic CP (bilateral or unilateral) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III who are able to comply with assessment procedures and exercise programme with or without support. Participants will be recruited from at least 12 UK NHS Trust physiotherapy and related services. Participants (n = 334) will be randomized (centralized computer-generated one:one allocation ratio) to either: 1) a dynamic stretching exercise programme, with six one-to-one physiotherapy sessions over 16 weeks; or 2) usual NHS care, with a single physiotherapy session and an assessment, and advice regarding self-management and exercise.Conclusion: The primary outcome is functional mobility measured using the child-/parent-reported Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) at six months. Secondary outcomes are: joint range of motion (Cerebral Palsy Integrated Pathway protocol) and motor function (timed up and go test) at six months; functional mobility (GOAL) at 12 months; independence (GOAL subdomain A); balance (GOAL subdomain A, B, D); pain and discomfort (GOAL subdomain C); health-related quality of life (youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y)); educational attendance; exercise adherence; and additional physiotherapy treatment at six and 12 months. The primary analysis will be intention to treat.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(5):506–516.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2025
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 6 (5) , 517-527
Clinical effectiveness of an individually tailored strengthening programme, including progressive resistance exercises and advice, compared to usual care for ambulant adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy (ROBUST trial): a parallel group randomized controlled trial
Aims: Muscle strengthening exercises are one of the interventions frequently prescribed by physiotherapists for adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). However, there is wide variability in the exercise regimes used and limited evidence of their effectiveness. The ROBUST trial will assess the clinical effectiveness of an individually tailored strengthening programme, including progressive resistance exercises and advice, compared to usual care for ambulant adolescents with spastic CP.Methods: We are conducting a multicentre, two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial. We will recruit adolescents aged 12 to 18 years with a diagnosis of spastic CP (bilateral or unilateral) Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III who are able to comply with the assessment procedures and exercise programme with or without support. Participants will be recruited from at least 12 UK NHS Trust physiotherapy and related services. Participants (n = 334) will be randomized (centralized computer-generated 1:1 allocation ratio) to either: 1) a progressive resistance exercise programme, with six one-to-one physiotherapy sessions over 16 weeks; or 2) usual NHS care, with a single physiotherapy session and an assessment session, and advice regarding self-management and exercise.Conclusion: The primary outcome is functional mobility measured using the child-/parent-reported Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) at six months. Secondary outcomes are: clinician-assessed muscle strength (Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test) and motor function (timed up and go test) at six months; functional mobility (GOAL) at 12 months; independence (GOAL subdomain A), balance (GOAL subdomain A, B, D), pain and discomfort (GOAL subdomain C), health-related quality of life (youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire; EQ-5D-Y), educational attendance, exercise adherence, and additional physiotherapy treatment (six and 12 months). The primary analysis will be intention to treat.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(5):517–527.
- 1 May 2025
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 6 (5) , 517-527
Open AccessClinical effectiveness of an individually tailored strengthening programme, including progressive resistance exercises and advice, compared to usual care for ambulant adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy (ROBUST trial): a parallel group randomized controlled trial
Aims: Muscle strengthening exercises are one of the interventions frequently prescribed by physiotherapists for adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). However, there is wide variability in the exercise regimes used and limited evidence of their effectiveness. The ROBUST trial will assess the clinical effectiveness of an individually tailored strengthening programme, including progressive resistance exercises and advice, compared to usual care for ambulant adolescents with spastic CP.Methods: We are conducting a multicentre, two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial. We will recruit adolescents aged 12 to 18 years with a diagnosis of spastic CP (bilateral or unilateral) Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III who are able to comply with the assessment procedures and exercise programme with or without support. Participants will be recruited from at least 12 UK NHS Trust physiotherapy and related services. Participants (n = 334) will be randomized (centralized computer-generated 1:1 allocation ratio) to either: 1) a progressive resistance exercise programme, with six one-to-one physiotherapy sessions over 16 weeks; or 2) usual NHS care, with a single physiotherapy session and an assessment session, and advice regarding self-management and exercise.Conclusion: The primary outcome is functional mobility measured using the child-/parent-reported Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) at six months. Secondary outcomes are: clinician-assessed muscle strength (Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test) and motor function (timed up and go test) at six months; functional mobility (GOAL) at 12 months; independence (GOAL subdomain A), balance (GOAL subdomain A, B, D), pain and discomfort (GOAL subdomain C), health-related quality of life (youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire; EQ-5D-Y), educational attendance, exercise adherence, and additional physiotherapy treatment (six and 12 months). The primary analysis will be intention to treat.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(5):517–527.