Hao Zhang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Hao Zhang has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kaiyue Xu
College of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, Dezhou 253034, China
1 shared publication - Minghui Zheng
Shandong Huayu University of Technology, Dezhou, China
1 shared publication - Shui Yu
School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
1 shared publication - Wenqiang Yu
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, Dezhou 253034, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 May 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Bioengineering
- Vol. 12 (5) , 491
The Detection of Gait Events Based on Smartphones and Deep Learning
This study aims to detect gait events using a smartphone combined with deep learning and evaluate the remote effects and clinical significance of this method in different elderly populations and patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). In total, 150 healthy individuals aged 20–70 years were asked to attach a smartphone to their thighs and walk six gait cycles at self-selected low, normal, and high speeds, using an insole pressure sensor as the reference standard for gait events. A deep learning model was then established using BiTCN-BiGRU-CrossAttention, and two models (TCN-GRU and BiTCN-BiGRU) were compared. In total, 48 elderly (25 healthy, 12 with mild cognitive impairment, 11 with Parkinson’s disease) participated in an online home assessment, completing single-task and cognitive dual-task walking. Overall, 35 CSVD patients participated in an offline clinical assessment, completing single-task, cognitive dual-task, and physical dual-task walking. The BiTCN-BiGRU-CrossAttention model had the lowest MAE for detecting gait events compared to the other models. All models had lower MAEs for detecting heel strikes than toe-offs, and the MAE for low and high walking was higher than for normal speed walking. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in gait parameters (Cadence, Stride time, Stance phase, Swing phase, Stance time, Swing time, Stride length, and walking speed) between single-task and cognitive dual-task walking for all online elderly participants. CSVD patients showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in gait parameters (Cadence, Stride time, Stance phase, Swing phase, Stance time, Stride length, and walking speed) between single-task and cognitive dual-task and between single-task and physical dual-task walking.
- 4 May 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Bioengineering
- Vol. 12 (5) , 491
Open AccessThe Detection of Gait Events Based on Smartphones and Deep Learning
This study aims to detect gait events using a smartphone combined with deep learning and evaluate the remote effects and clinical significance of this method in different elderly populations and patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). In total, 150 healthy individuals aged 20–70 years were asked to attach a smartphone to their thighs and walk six gait cycles at self-selected low, normal, and high speeds, using an insole pressure sensor as the reference standard for gait events. A deep learning model was then established using BiTCN-BiGRU-CrossAttention, and two models (TCN-GRU and BiTCN-BiGRU) were compared. In total, 48 elderly (25 healthy, 12 with mild cognitive impairment, 11 with Parkinson’s disease) participated in an online home assessment, completing single-task and cognitive dual-task walking. Overall, 35 CSVD patients participated in an offline clinical assessment, completing single-task, cognitive dual-task, and physical dual-task walking. The BiTCN-BiGRU-CrossAttention model had the lowest MAE for detecting gait events compared to the other models. All models had lower MAEs for detecting heel strikes than toe-offs, and the MAE for low and high walking was higher than for normal speed walking. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in gait parameters (Cadence, Stride time, Stance phase, Swing phase, Stance time, Swing time, Stride length, and walking speed) between single-task and cognitive dual-task walking for all online elderly participants. CSVD patients showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in gait parameters (Cadence, Stride time, Stance phase, Swing phase, Stance time, Stride length, and walking speed) between single-task and cognitive dual-task and between single-task and physical dual-task walking.