Zhipeng Zhang

During the waterflooding recovery process, water is injected into the hydrocarbon reservoirs and displaces a portion of the oil and gas, thereby improving oil and gas recovery rates and extending the production life of the reservoir. The macro benefits of waterflooding technology are widely recognized; however, the micro-scale effects of water on the reservoir’s pore structure and fluid distribution during the injection process remain underexplored. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the micro-distribution characteristics of fluids in the reservoir during the oil–water displacement process. To further investigate the micro-mechanisms of waterflooding recovery and the factors influencing recovery efficiency, the study focuses on the impact of permeability, pressure gradient, injection volume, and reverse displacement on oil recovery efficiency. A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis approach was employed, using techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), CT scanning, and fluid distribution tomography to comprehensively analyze the fluid evolution patterns within the reservoir. The results show the following: (1) The movable fluids in the oilfield are primarily distributed within pores ranging from 0.1 to 40 μm; the remaining oil is mainly distributed within pores of 0.1 to 10 μm, accounting for over 85% of the total distribution, and these pores serve as the main space for extracting remaining oil in later stages. (2) Increasing the injection volume significantly improves the oil recovery efficiency in pores ranging from 0.1 to 10 μm. Increasing the displacement pressure gradient effectively reduces remaining oil in pores of 0.1 to 5 μm. However, for reservoirs with permeability greater than 10 mD, once the injection volume exceeds 1 PV or the displacement pressure gradient exceeds 1.8 MPa/m, the increase in oil recovery efficiency becomes marginal. (3) With increasing water injection multiples, the oil displacement efficiency of cores with varying permeability levels shows an overall upward trend. However, the extent of improvement varies significantly, with low-permeability cores exhibiting a markedly greater enhancement in displacement efficiency compared to high-permeability cores. (4) Reverse displacement can reduce the remaining oil in pores ranging from 0.1 to 10 μm, and the increase in oil recovery efficiency is more significant in cores with lower permeability than in those with higher permeability. Therefore, increased production cannot solely rely on improving the production pressure differential to develop remaining oil.