ESEmma Sutton

Emma Sutton

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Emma Sutton has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Understanding readmission after hip fracture: a mixed methods study protocol

    by Emma Sutton, Usama Rahman, Hannah Reilly, Caroline Miller, Tarunya Vedutla, Teresa Melody, Ranaganayaki Gudivada, Annie E Topping

    Introduction Around 75 000 people suffer from hip fractures yearly in the United Kingdom (UK) leading to significant mortality and morbidity. Although mortality has dropped from 8% to 5% between 2013 and 2023 after hip fractures, those undergoing surgery for hip fractures have a 30-day readmission rate which has remained stagnant at around 11% over the same decade in the UK. This study protocol describes a mixed-methods investigation (The ARTHUR Study—avoiding readmission after hip fracture) which aims to understand and offer solutions to prevent avoidable 30-day readmission after hip fracture surgery. The study will focus on two hospitals in acute and community settings in a large urban and ethnically diverse city in the UK. Methods and analysis We describe two work packages. Work Package One (WP1) involves analysis of 5 year’s worth of routinely collected health data provided by PIONEER, a Health Data Research UK data hub in Acute Care for our local population. Work Package Two (WP2) will involve semistructured interviews with patients, carers or family members as well as non-participant observations of hospital processes to understand systems-based issues related to readmissions after hip fracture surgery. Although recruitment may be an issue, our timeline for recruitment reflects this. We also aim to recruit a diverse population, which has often been under-represented in studies into hip fractures and aim to explore relevant interventions which can be widely generalisable. Ethics and dissemination This protocol was submitted via IRAS: 330074 and obtained UK NHS REC approval via the West Midlands Coventry and Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee (REC 23/WM/0242) on 25 January 2024. The results of this study will be published in relevant scientific journals and presented at orthopaedic, fragility fracture and geriatric specialty conferences and scientific meetings. A lay summary of the findings will be publicly available on the HRA website.


  • Open Access

    The SIMPLER Nutrition Pathway for Fragility Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative

    by Jack J. Bell, Olof Gudny Geirsdottir, Antony Johansen, Julie Santy-Tomlinson, Frede Frihagen, Rhona McGlasson, Emma Sutton, Karen Hertz

    Background/Objectives: Malnutrition is a key contributor to poor outcomes in older adults with fragility fractures, increasing the risk of complications, functional decline, prolonged hospital stays, mortality, and healthcare costs. Substantial evidence limited to hip fracture supports early, interdisciplinary nutrition care. However, global audits reveal that most hip fracture patients do not receive recommended interventions. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to co-create and test a pathway and toolkit to help apply evidence-based nutrition care in different fragility fracture settings globally. Methods: The SIMPLER Pathway and toolkit (SIMPLER) were developed through a multiphase, co-creation QI initiative (2018–2025), guided by the Knowledge-to-Action framework. Global experts and clinical teams synthesized evidence, identified the “know-do” gap, and adapted SIMPLER to context through iterative action–reflection cycles. The Model for Improvement guided team building, goal setting, testing changes, and measuring outcomes at pilot sites. Results: Over 100 co-creation activities between 2018 and 2025 engaged staff and patients to shape and refine SIMPLER. A global clinician survey (n = 308, 46 countries), two bi-national audits (n = 965, 63 hospitals), and qualitative interviews (n = 15) confirmed a widespread evidence-practice gap. The pathway and toolkit were pilot-tested in five hospitals across four countries, with action–reflection cycles enabling continuous refinement of prioritized nutrition improvements tailored to the local context. Following endorsement in late 2024, 46 healthcare services in 23 countries have formally committed to implementing SIMPLER. Conclusions: The SIMPLER Nutrition Pathway provides a scalable, adaptable framework to support the delivery of evidence-based nutrition care in fragility fracture settings. A global evaluation is underway.


  • Open Access

    The SIMPLER Nutrition Pathway for Fragility Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative

    by Jack J Bell, Ólöf Guðný Geirsdóttir, Antony Johansen, Julie Santy-Tomlinson, Frede Frihagen, Rhona McGlasson, Emma Sutton, Karen Hertz

    Background/Objectives: Malnutrition is a key contributor to poor outcomes in older adults with fragility fractures, increasing risk of complications, functional decline, prolonged hospital stays, mortality, and healthcare costs. Substantial evidence limited to hip fracture supports early, interdisciplinary nutrition care. However, global audits reveal that most hip fracture patients do not receive recommended interventions. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to co-create and test a pathway and toolkit to help apply evidence-based nutrition care in different fragility fracture settings globally. Methods: The SIMPLER Pathway and toolkit (SIMPLER) were developed through a multiphase, co-creation QI initiative (2018–2025), guided by the Knowledge-to-Action framework. Global experts and clinical teams synthesized evidence, identified the “know-do” gap, and adapted SIMPLER to context through iterative action-reflection cycles. The Model for Improvement guided team building, goal setting, testing changes, and measuring outcomes at pilot sites. Results: Over 100 co-creation activities between 2018 and 2025 engaged staff and patients to shape and refine SIMPLER. A global clinician survey (n=308, 46 countries), two bi-national audits (n=965, 63 hospitals), and qualitative interviews (n=15) confirmed a widespread evidence-practice gap. The pathway and toolkit were pilot-tested in five hospitals across four countries, with action-reflection cycles enabling continuous refinement of prioritized nutrition improvements tailored to local context. Following endorsement in late 2024, 46 healthcare services in 23 countries have formally committed to implementing SIMPLER. Conclusion: The SIMPLER Nutrition Pathway provides a scalable, adaptable framework to support delivery of evidence-based nutrition care in fragility fracture settings. A global evaluation is underway.