Giovanna Barbosa Francisconi
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Giovanna Barbosa Francisconi has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Caroline Liberato Marchiolli
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Brazil
1 shared publication - Daniela Ponzoni
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
1 shared publication - Idelmo Rangel Garcia Júnior
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil
1 shared publication - Izabella Sol
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil
1 shared publication - Karen Rawen Tonini1 shared publication
- Lara Cristina Cunha Cervantes
Department of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090 Vienna, Austria
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Brazilian Journals in Contribuciones A Las Ciencias Sociales
- Vol. 17 (8) , e9691
Different implant surfaces modulate bone repair? Insights from histomorphometric and SEM/EDS analyses
Objective: Characterize the newly formed bone tissue adjacent to implant surfaces. Methods: The implants were previously analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and installed in the right tibia of 75 rats divided into polished, machined, and treated groups. After euthanasia on 3, 7, 15, 21, and 40 postoperative days, histological analysis was performed to evaluate bone-implant contact. Results: At topographic analysis on the SEM, the polish group had the smoothest and regular surface and roughness surface in the treated group. On the EDS analysis, all groups had no contamination on the superficies and similar compouds (Titanium, Aluminum, and Vanadium). In terms of quality, the process of osseointegration was similar across all groups. However, a quantitative analysis showed that mature bone formed around the implant threads, even in areas near the bone marrow, with significant difference at seven days between the polished and treated groups. Conclusion: The peri-implant repair pattern was similar among all surface types in all other timelines, with cortical bone formation throughout the titanium surface of the three implant groups. The acid-etched surface treatment group showed faster bone differentiation.
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Brazilian Journals in Contribuciones A Las Ciencias Sociales
- Vol. 17 (8) , e9691
Open AccessDifferent implant surfaces modulate bone repair? Insights from histomorphometric and SEM/EDS analyses
Objective: Characterize the newly formed bone tissue adjacent to implant surfaces. Methods: The implants were previously analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and installed in the right tibia of 75 rats divided into polished, machined, and treated groups. After euthanasia on 3, 7, 15, 21, and 40 postoperative days, histological analysis was performed to evaluate bone-implant contact. Results: At topographic analysis on the SEM, the polish group had the smoothest and regular surface and roughness surface in the treated group. On the EDS analysis, all groups had no contamination on the superficies and similar compouds (Titanium, Aluminum, and Vanadium). In terms of quality, the process of osseointegration was similar across all groups. However, a quantitative analysis showed that mature bone formed around the implant threads, even in areas near the bone marrow, with significant difference at seven days between the polished and treated groups. Conclusion: The peri-implant repair pattern was similar among all surface types in all other timelines, with cortical bone formation throughout the titanium surface of the three implant groups. The acid-etched surface treatment group showed faster bone differentiation.