GCGuido Costamagna

Guido Costamagna

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Guido Costamagna has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Undifferentiated Carcinoma With Osteoclast-like Giant Cells of the Pancreas Diagnosed by EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy

    by Michele Francesco Chiappetta, Marco Murgiano, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Cristina Ciuffini, Luigi Giovanni Papparella, Salvatore Francesco Vadalà di Prampero, Marcello Fiorani, Guido Costamagna, Milutin Bulajic

    Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas is an extremely rare malignancy with nonspecific radiological features, often requiring histological confirmation. We report the case of a 57-year-old woman presenting with abdominal pain and cholestasis, in whom imaging revealed a pancreatic head mass. After an initial nondiagnostic endoscopic ultrasound sampling, endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle biopsy performed at our tertiary referral center allowed definitive diagnosis by identifying characteristic osteoclast-like giant cells and undifferentiated neoplastic cells with a specific immunohistochemical profile. This case highlights the key role of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells.

  • Open Access

    Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    by Guido Costamagna, Cristina Ciuffini

  • Intragastric Balloon for Treatment of Overweight and Obesity: Which Is the Best Filling Volume? A Single-Center Randomized Study

    by Vadalà di Prampero, Salvatore Francesco, Ica Bassu, Marcello Fiorani, Valentina Cosseddu, Paola Bazzu, Alessandro Zuddas, Ilaria Simonelli, Chiara Rocchi, Marco Massidda, et al.

    Introduction Fluid-filled intragastric balloon (FF-IGB) placement is an endoscopic bariatric procedure that effectively achieves short-term weight loss in patients affected by obesity. Comparative data among different balloon volumes are lacking. This study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of FF-IGB at different volumes. Methods A randomized single-center analysis over 156 patients undergoing FF-IGB at a volume of 500 ml, 600 ml, or 700 ml with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Outcomes included postprocedural adverse events (AEs), early device removal for intolerance, evaluation of percentage of total weight loss (TWL%), excess weight loss (EWL%), and quality of life (QoL) at 6-month follow-up. Results The mean age of our cohort was 46.2 years, and 69.2% were female. The mean BMI was 41.9 kg/m2. Pain was the main adverse event being detected in 78.3% patients, followed by nausea (76.8%), and vomiting (50.7%). No serious AEs were reported. Ten patients required early balloon removal for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The FF-IGB volume was not associated with nausea (p = 0.657), vomiting (p = 0.487), pain (p = 0.182), or early removal (p = 0.988). Decrease in body mass index (BMI) after 6 months was significant (mean BMI 35.24 kg/m2, SD 7.17, p < 0.001). Mean TWL% after 6 months was 14.16. No significant difference between the FF-IGB volume and TWL% (p = 0.412) was detected. At 6 months follow-up, the mean EWL% was 30.8 ± 23.3 with no differences among the three groups of different FF-IGB volumes (p = 0.733). A significant improvement of QoL was detected at 6 months unrelated to the FF-IGB volume (p = 0.849). Conclusion FF-IGB placement resulted in significant weight loss over a 6-month period. No differences in TWL%, EWL%, rate of AEs, percentage of early device removal, and QoL were detected among the three groups with a different IGB volume. A 500 ml filling volume could be “the magic number” as no significant benefits are achieved with a greater volume. Key Points • Fluid-filled intragastric balloon (FF-IGB) placement effectively achieves short-term weight loss in patients affected by obesity, but comparative data among different balloon volumes are lacking. • Weight-loss outcomes, adverse-event rates, and quality-of-life gains were identical across 500 ml, 600 ml, and 700 ml balloon volumes. • A 500 ml filling volume for fluid-filled intragastric balloons could be “the magic number,” as larger volumes confer no additional benefit.


  • Patency Capsule

    by Guido Costamagna, Maria Elena Riccioni, Clelia Marmo, Martin Keuchel, Ingo Steinbrück