Toby Milne-Clark
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Toby Milne-Clark has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alex Freeman
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre University College London Hospital London UK
5 shared publications - Alimu Dayimu
Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit Cancer Theme, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
5 shared publications - Alopa Malaviya
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
5 shared publications - Andrea Machin
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
5 shared publications - Anne Y. Warren
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
5 shared publications - Asaf Rotem
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 June 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Graph of % change in PARylated protein (PAR) expression against % change in PSA from baseline (pre-treatment) for olaparib and olaparib plus degarelix cohorts.
- 13 June 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Graph of % change in PARylated protein (PAR) expression against % change in PSA from baseline (pre-treatment) for olaparib and olaparib plus degarelix cohorts.
- Open Access
- 13 June 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S2 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Additional RNA sequencing analysis performed from CANCAP03 study.
- 13 June 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S2 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Additional RNA sequencing analysis performed from CANCAP03 study.
- Open Access
- 13 June 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S3 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Figure S3 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
- 13 June 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S3 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Figure S3 from Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
- Open Access
- 13 May 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 31 (12) , 2347-2357
Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Purpose: The purpose was to investigate combined PARP and androgen inhibition in primary prostate cancer and understand the biological mechanisms underlying clinical efficacy, especially in the absence of mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair pathways. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to measure PARP inhibition, and the secondary objectives were to assess safety and feasibility. Participants received olaparib for 2 weeks before prostatectomy and were randomly assigned or not assigned (1:1) to degarelix. We analyzed diagnostic biopsy and radical prostatectomy samples for PARylated protein expression using IHC. Exploratory analyses included tumor gene sequencing, mutation analysis, and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) using both bulk and single-cell RNA-seq performed on pretreatment and posttreatment tissues. Results: PARylated protein expression was significantly reduced in both cohorts, with no drug-related delays in radical prostatectomy. The gene set enrichment analysis identified distinct treatment response signatures related to olaparib in both cohorts and showed downregulation of androgen response genes after olaparib + degarelix treatment. Transcript profiling revealed an upregulation of the p53 hallmark, which was more pronounced with the combination treatment. Canonical cell-cycle progression hallmarks, including E2F targets and the G2–M checkpoint, were suppressed across all cases, correlating with a HR-deficient transcriptional signature. Single-nuclear RNA-seq indicated a greater increase in inflammatory response pathway activity within tumor epithelia after combination treatment. Conclusions: Transcriptomic analysis identified common hallmark alterations reflecting the combined impact of PARP inhibitor and androgen blockade on cell-cycle progression. We observed a shared phenotypic response to combination therapy across prostate cancers without known HR repair gene alterations. This suggests alternative mechanisms rather than antiandrogen-induced HR deficiency.
- 13 May 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 31 (12) , 2347-2357
Open AccessCambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer
Purpose: The purpose was to investigate combined PARP and androgen inhibition in primary prostate cancer and understand the biological mechanisms underlying clinical efficacy, especially in the absence of mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair pathways. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to measure PARP inhibition, and the secondary objectives were to assess safety and feasibility. Participants received olaparib for 2 weeks before prostatectomy and were randomly assigned or not assigned (1:1) to degarelix. We analyzed diagnostic biopsy and radical prostatectomy samples for PARylated protein expression using IHC. Exploratory analyses included tumor gene sequencing, mutation analysis, and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) using both bulk and single-cell RNA-seq performed on pretreatment and posttreatment tissues. Results: PARylated protein expression was significantly reduced in both cohorts, with no drug-related delays in radical prostatectomy. The gene set enrichment analysis identified distinct treatment response signatures related to olaparib in both cohorts and showed downregulation of androgen response genes after olaparib + degarelix treatment. Transcript profiling revealed an upregulation of the p53 hallmark, which was more pronounced with the combination treatment. Canonical cell-cycle progression hallmarks, including E2F targets and the G2–M checkpoint, were suppressed across all cases, correlating with a HR-deficient transcriptional signature. Single-nuclear RNA-seq indicated a greater increase in inflammatory response pathway activity within tumor epithelia after combination treatment. Conclusions: Transcriptomic analysis identified common hallmark alterations reflecting the combined impact of PARP inhibitor and androgen blockade on cell-cycle progression. We observed a shared phenotypic response to combination therapy across prostate cancers without known HR repair gene alterations. This suggests alternative mechanisms rather than antiandrogen-induced HR deficiency.