Shipeng Fu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Shipeng Fu has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ke Ye
Coloplast Inc., Chengdu 610074, China
1 shared publication - Qingxiao Zheng
College of Artificial Intelligence (CUIT Shuangliu Industrial College), Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
1 shared publication - Shibin Zhang
College of Artificial Intelligence, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
1 shared publication - Xuedong Li
College of Artificial Intelligence (CUIT Shuangliu Industrial College), Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
1 shared publication - Yingke Chen
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Reliable Deep Learning Model for ECG Interpretation: Mitigating Overconfidence and Direct Uncertainty Quantification
Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation using deep learning models holds immense potential for improving cardiac diagnosis. However, existing models often suffer from overconfident predictions and lack the capability to directly quantify uncertainty, leading to unreliable clinical guidance. To address this challenge, we propose a model for uncertainty-aware ECG interpretation. The model employs a deep convolutional architecture with max-pooling residual modules to capture both local and global spatiotemporal features from raw ECG signals. The architectural design respects the symmetry inherent in ECG waveforms—such as periodicity and morphological consistency across cardiac cycles—enabling the network to extract clinically relevant features more effectively. Then, unlike conventional models that rely on softmax-based probability outputs, our approach parameterizes class distributions using the Dirichlet distribution, while Subjective Logic translates these parameters into interpretable belief masses and uncertainty scores. We evaluate the model on the PhysioNet Challenge 2017 dataset, our model achieves an accuracy of 86.12%, an F1 score of 83.14%, a Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR-AUC) of 85.25%, and a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 92.87%—outperforming baseline models in three out of four metrics. Critically, the model reduces overconfidence to 0.59% (compared to 12–22% in softmax-based baselines), aligning prediction confidence with true accuracy. By progressively increasing the uncertainty threshold u, the model dynamically filters low-confidence predictions, leading to consistently improved performance—reaching up to 93.59% accuracy, 93.22% F1 score, 89.17% PR-AUC, and 95.10% ROC-AUC at u = 0.1. These results validate the model’s capacity for reliable ECG interpretation while leveraging physiological signal symmetry for enhanced feature extraction.
Open AccessA Reliable Deep Learning Model for ECG Interpretation: Mitigating Overconfidence and Direct Uncertainty Quantification
Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation using deep learning models holds immense potential for improving cardiac diagnosis. However, existing models often suffer from overconfident predictions and lack the capability to directly quantify uncertainty, leading to unreliable clinical guidance. To address this challenge, we propose a model for uncertainty-aware ECG interpretation. The model employs a deep convolutional architecture with max-pooling residual modules to capture both local and global spatiotemporal features from raw ECG signals. The architectural design respects the symmetry inherent in ECG waveforms—such as periodicity and morphological consistency across cardiac cycles—enabling the network to extract clinically relevant features more effectively. Then, unlike conventional models that rely on softmax-based probability outputs, our approach parameterizes class distributions using the Dirichlet distribution, while Subjective Logic translates these parameters into interpretable belief masses and uncertainty scores. We evaluate the model on the PhysioNet Challenge 2017 dataset, our model achieves an accuracy of 86.12%, an F1 score of 83.14%, a Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR-AUC) of 85.25%, and a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 92.87%—outperforming baseline models in three out of four metrics. Critically, the model reduces overconfidence to 0.59% (compared to 12–22% in softmax-based baselines), aligning prediction confidence with true accuracy. By progressively increasing the uncertainty threshold u, the model dynamically filters low-confidence predictions, leading to consistently improved performance—reaching up to 93.59% accuracy, 93.22% F1 score, 89.17% PR-AUC, and 95.10% ROC-AUC at u = 0.1. These results validate the model’s capacity for reliable ECG interpretation while leveraging physiological signal symmetry for enhanced feature extraction.