Chenghao Hua
Chenghao Hua
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Chenghao Hua has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Qiong He
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
1 shared publication - Wenjing Xu
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
1 shared publication - Yufei Zhao
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 May 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (11) , 4876
Determining Indoor Parameters for Thermal Comfort and Energy Saving in Shopping Malls in Summer: A Field Study in China
Local data about indoor thermal comfort are in short supply, which are always different from the predicted results produced by models shown in previous studies. Shopping malls that consume substantial energy need to save energy, provided that thermal comfort is maintained. Therefore, this research investigated indoor thermal comfort using field measurements and questionnaires in a typical shopping mall in Danyang, China, with a hot summer and cold winter climate in order to explore local demands and energy-saving potential. The findings are as follows: (1) The average air temperature () and operative temperature () are 26.7 °C and 26.4 °C, which implies a minor influence from radiation and other factors on . Women are more sensitive to changes in outdoor temperature since clothing insulation () varies by gender: 0.31 clo and 0.36 clo for male and female individuals, respectively. (2) The thermal neutral temperature (TNT) derived from the thermal sensation vote (TSV) is 25.26 °C, which is significantly higher than the 21.77 °C obtained from the predicted mean vote (PMV) model. (3) There is a wide range of acceptable temperatures for thermal comfort because the highest temperature was identified by the thermal comfort vote (TCV) at 27.55 °C, followed closely by 27.48 °C, 26.78 °C, and 25.32 °C, which were separately derived from the thermal acceptance vote (TAV), TSV, and predicted percentage of dissatisfied (PPD) people; these were based on an upper limit of the acceptable 80% range. (4) In total, 94.85% of respondents accepted the indoor air quality, although the median concentration of CO2 was 772 ppm, and the neutral relative humidity level was 70.60%. Meanwhile, there is an important relationship between air quality satisfaction and operative temperature; thus, the temperature (26.93 °C) with peak satisfaction can enhance air quality perception and thermal comfort. (5) The energy savings that can be achieved are 25.77% and 9.12% at most based on acceptable thermal comfort compared with baseline energy consumption at 23 °C and 26 °C, respectively.- 26 May 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (11) , 4876
Open AccessDetermining Indoor Parameters for Thermal Comfort and Energy Saving in Shopping Malls in Summer: A Field Study in China
Local data about indoor thermal comfort are in short supply, which are always different from the predicted results produced by models shown in previous studies. Shopping malls that consume substantial energy need to save energy, provided that thermal comfort is maintained. Therefore, this research investigated indoor thermal comfort using field measurements and questionnaires in a typical shopping mall in Danyang, China, with a hot summer and cold winter climate in order to explore local demands and energy-saving potential. The findings are as follows: (1) The average air temperature () and operative temperature () are 26.7 °C and 26.4 °C, which implies a minor influence from radiation and other factors on . Women are more sensitive to changes in outdoor temperature since clothing insulation () varies by gender: 0.31 clo and 0.36 clo for male and female individuals, respectively. (2) The thermal neutral temperature (TNT) derived from the thermal sensation vote (TSV) is 25.26 °C, which is significantly higher than the 21.77 °C obtained from the predicted mean vote (PMV) model. (3) There is a wide range of acceptable temperatures for thermal comfort because the highest temperature was identified by the thermal comfort vote (TCV) at 27.55 °C, followed closely by 27.48 °C, 26.78 °C, and 25.32 °C, which were separately derived from the thermal acceptance vote (TAV), TSV, and predicted percentage of dissatisfied (PPD) people; these were based on an upper limit of the acceptable 80% range. (4) In total, 94.85% of respondents accepted the indoor air quality, although the median concentration of CO2 was 772 ppm, and the neutral relative humidity level was 70.60%. Meanwhile, there is an important relationship between air quality satisfaction and operative temperature; thus, the temperature (26.93 °C) with peak satisfaction can enhance air quality perception and thermal comfort. (5) The energy savings that can be achieved are 25.77% and 9.12% at most based on acceptable thermal comfort compared with baseline energy consumption at 23 °C and 26 °C, respectively.