Robin Kuo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Robin Kuo has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Amit K. Verma
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
2 shared publications - Anthony D. Rollett
Carnegie Mellon University
2 shared publications - Emma Strubell
Carnegie Mellon University
2 shared publications - Junwon Seo
Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
2 shared publications - Runbo Jiang
Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
2 shared publications - Zhisong Zhang
Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 26 September 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
- Vol. 14 (4) , 643-656
Text Mining for Process–Structure–Properties Relationships in Metals
- 26 September 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
- Vol. 14 (4) , 643-656
Text Mining for Process–Structure–Properties Relationships in Metals
- Open Access
Structured Extraction of Process Structure Properties Relationships in Materials Science
With the advent of large language models (LLMs), the vast unstructured text within millions of academic papers is increasingly accessible for materials discovery, although significant challenges remain. While LLMs offer promising few- and zero-shot learning capabilities, particularly valuable in the materials domain where expert annotations are scarce, general-purpose LLMs often fail to address key materials-specific queries without further adaptation. To bridge this gap, fine-tuning LLMs on human-labeled data is essential for effective structured knowledge extraction. In this study, we introduce a novel annotation schema designed to extract generic process-structure-properties relationships from scientific literature. We demonstrate the utility of this approach using a dataset of 128 abstracts, with annotations drawn from two distinct domains: high-temperature materials (Domain I) and uncertainty quantification in simulating materials microstructure (Domain II). Initially, we developed a conditional random field (CRF) model based on MatBERT, a domain-specific BERT variant, and evaluated its performance on Domain I. Subsequently, we compared this model with a fine-tuned LLM (GPT-4o from OpenAI) under identical conditions. Our results indicate that fine-tuning LLMs can significantly improve entity extraction performance over the BERT-CRF baseline on Domain I. However, when additional examples from Domain II were incorporated, the performance of the BERT-CRF model became comparable to that of the GPT-4o model. These findings underscore the potential of our schema for structured knowledge extraction and highlight the complementary strengths of both modeling approaches.
Open AccessStructured Extraction of Process Structure Properties Relationships in Materials Science
With the advent of large language models (LLMs), the vast unstructured text within millions of academic papers is increasingly accessible for materials discovery, although significant challenges remain. While LLMs offer promising few- and zero-shot learning capabilities, particularly valuable in the materials domain where expert annotations are scarce, general-purpose LLMs often fail to address key materials-specific queries without further adaptation. To bridge this gap, fine-tuning LLMs on human-labeled data is essential for effective structured knowledge extraction. In this study, we introduce a novel annotation schema designed to extract generic process-structure-properties relationships from scientific literature. We demonstrate the utility of this approach using a dataset of 128 abstracts, with annotations drawn from two distinct domains: high-temperature materials (Domain I) and uncertainty quantification in simulating materials microstructure (Domain II). Initially, we developed a conditional random field (CRF) model based on MatBERT, a domain-specific BERT variant, and evaluated its performance on Domain I. Subsequently, we compared this model with a fine-tuned LLM (GPT-4o from OpenAI) under identical conditions. Our results indicate that fine-tuning LLMs can significantly improve entity extraction performance over the BERT-CRF baseline on Domain I. However, when additional examples from Domain II were incorporated, the performance of the BERT-CRF model became comparable to that of the GPT-4o model. These findings underscore the potential of our schema for structured knowledge extraction and highlight the complementary strengths of both modeling approaches.