Luca Frigau
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Luca Frigau has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Barbara Msc Rocca
Children’s Orthopedics, Lenval Hospital, 57, Av. Californie, 06200 Nice, France
1 shared publication - Calogero Foti
Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Federico Arippa
Department of Mechanical, Chemical, and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
1 shared publication - Marco Guicciardi
University of Cagliari, Italy
1 shared publication - Marco Monticone
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
1 shared publication - Silvano Ferrari
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 January 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Vol. 104 (6) , 506-510
Model of Fear of Movement/(Re)injury Runs Clockwise From Catastrophizing
Objective: The aim of the study is to provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the cognitive-behavioral model of fear of movement/(re)injury. Design: A cross-sectional analysis of 180 outpatients with chronic nonspecific low back pain who completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression, and a pain intensity numerical rating scale. The intercorrelations of the outcome measures were estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and regression analyses were used to examine their predictive values by following the left side of the fear of movement/(re)injury clockwise from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (P = 0.05). A postdictive analysis dichotomizing the sample into high- and low-level catastrophizers evaluated the effects of addressing catastrophizing on disability and pain. Results: The intercorrelations of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression and numerical rating scale were respectively r = 0.59, r = 0.54, r = 0.18, and r = 0.44. Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia significantly predicted Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression; and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression significantly predicted numerical rating scale. The postdictive analysis showed that addressing catastrophizing reduces disability and pain experience by 14% in high-level catastrophizers and 86% in low-level catastrophizers. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the fear of movement/(re)injury.
- 13 January 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Vol. 104 (6) , 506-510
Open AccessModel of Fear of Movement/(Re)injury Runs Clockwise From Catastrophizing
Objective: The aim of the study is to provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the cognitive-behavioral model of fear of movement/(re)injury. Design: A cross-sectional analysis of 180 outpatients with chronic nonspecific low back pain who completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression, and a pain intensity numerical rating scale. The intercorrelations of the outcome measures were estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and regression analyses were used to examine their predictive values by following the left side of the fear of movement/(re)injury clockwise from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (P = 0.05). A postdictive analysis dichotomizing the sample into high- and low-level catastrophizers evaluated the effects of addressing catastrophizing on disability and pain. Results: The intercorrelations of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression and numerical rating scale were respectively r = 0.59, r = 0.54, r = 0.18, and r = 0.44. Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia significantly predicted Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression; and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–Depression significantly predicted numerical rating scale. The postdictive analysis showed that addressing catastrophizing reduces disability and pain experience by 14% in high-level catastrophizers and 86% in low-level catastrophizers. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the fear of movement/(re)injury.