Anna Johansson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Anna Johansson has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jakob Axelsson
Mälardalen University
1 shared publication - Marjorie Nawila Pettersson
Mälardalen University
1 shared publication - Pontus Svenson
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-412 58 Gothenburg, Sweden
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 May 2025
- Published by Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management
Strengths and Limitations of Existing STAMP Tools for Analyzing System of Systems Risks
The System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) considers safety as a dynamic problem by focusing on interactions among system components rather than on component failure. However, analyzing complex system risks with STAMP can be challenging due to manual processes. Therefore, software tools supporting STAMP analysis have been developed. An evaluation of five tools (ASTAH, STPA, Capella, XSTAMPP, STPA Master Lite, and Visio Pro) was conducted, focusing on systems of systems (SoS) risk analysis. While all tools demonstrated compliance with the STAMP risk analysis procedure, with some tools offering additional features, a shortcoming in scalability limits the support for risk analysis of SoS. This makes risk analysis with the available STAMP tools challenging for SoS. Recommended enhancements include mechanisms to address SoS characteristics, scalability, collaboration, and improved usability. The study contributes to research on SoS risk analysis and provides direction for advancement in risk analysis tool support.
- 18 May 2025
- Published by Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management
Open AccessStrengths and Limitations of Existing STAMP Tools for Analyzing System of Systems Risks
The System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) considers safety as a dynamic problem by focusing on interactions among system components rather than on component failure. However, analyzing complex system risks with STAMP can be challenging due to manual processes. Therefore, software tools supporting STAMP analysis have been developed. An evaluation of five tools (ASTAH, STPA, Capella, XSTAMPP, STPA Master Lite, and Visio Pro) was conducted, focusing on systems of systems (SoS) risk analysis. While all tools demonstrated compliance with the STAMP risk analysis procedure, with some tools offering additional features, a shortcoming in scalability limits the support for risk analysis of SoS. This makes risk analysis with the available STAMP tools challenging for SoS. Recommended enhancements include mechanisms to address SoS characteristics, scalability, collaboration, and improved usability. The study contributes to research on SoS risk analysis and provides direction for advancement in risk analysis tool support.