Chubo Wang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Chubo Wang has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Jiaying Ma
College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering Shihezi University Shihezi Xinjiang China
1 shared publication- Jiaying Ma
College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
1 shared publication - Jiliang Zheng
Xinjiang Xinlianxin Energy and Chemical Company Limited, Manasi 832200, China
1 shared publication - Jingcheng Wang
College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
1 shared publication Liang Li
School of Soil and Water Conservation Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power Nanchang China
1 shared publicationLibing Song
College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering Shihezi University Shihezi Xinjiang China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 14 July 2026
- Published by Wiley in Irrigation and Drainage
Responses of Processing Tomato Growth and the Soil Microenvironment to Micro‐Nano Aeration and Humic Acid Application Under Warming Drip Irrigation
Plastic‐mulched drip irrigation is widely used in arid regions, but it may aggravate root‐zone hypoxia and salinity. A two‐year field experiment based on two two‐factor designs was conducted in Xinjiang, China, during 2023 and 2024 to investigate the combined effects of irrigation‐water temperature (10°C–15°C and 20°C–25°C), aeration method (5 mg L −1 (no aeration)) and 18 mg L −1 (micro‐nano aeration) and humic acid application (0 and 0.5% of fertigation mass) on processing tomato growth, yield, fruit quality, root‐zone soil conditions and greenhouse gas fluxes. Micro‐nano aeration and humic acid significantly increased yield and improved fruit quality, with maximum yields of 198.1–205.9 t ha −1 . Irrigation‐water warming increased single fruit weight by 4% and soluble sugar content by 8%–10%. These responses were associated with improved soil oxygen and water availability and reduced effective salinity. Aeration and humic acid increased CO 2 and N 2 O emissions but also promoted CH 4 uptake. Structural equation modelling showed that soil oxygen and temperature were the main drivers of plant growth and lycopene accumulation. The combined application of warmed irrigation water, micro‐nano aeration and humic acid was an effective strategy for improving processing tomato production in arid regions.
- 14 July 2026
- Published by Wiley in Irrigation and Drainage
Responses of Processing Tomato Growth and the Soil Microenvironment to Micro‐Nano Aeration and Humic Acid Application Under Warming Drip Irrigation
Plastic‐mulched drip irrigation is widely used in arid regions, but it may aggravate root‐zone hypoxia and salinity. A two‐year field experiment based on two two‐factor designs was conducted in Xinjiang, China, during 2023 and 2024 to investigate the combined effects of irrigation‐water temperature (10°C–15°C and 20°C–25°C), aeration method (5 mg L −1 (no aeration)) and 18 mg L −1 (micro‐nano aeration) and humic acid application (0 and 0.5% of fertigation mass) on processing tomato growth, yield, fruit quality, root‐zone soil conditions and greenhouse gas fluxes. Micro‐nano aeration and humic acid significantly increased yield and improved fruit quality, with maximum yields of 198.1–205.9 t ha −1 . Irrigation‐water warming increased single fruit weight by 4% and soluble sugar content by 8%–10%. These responses were associated with improved soil oxygen and water availability and reduced effective salinity. Aeration and humic acid increased CO 2 and N 2 O emissions but also promoted CH 4 uptake. Structural equation modelling showed that soil oxygen and temperature were the main drivers of plant growth and lycopene accumulation. The combined application of warmed irrigation water, micro‐nano aeration and humic acid was an effective strategy for improving processing tomato production in arid regions.
- Open Access
Integrated Effects of Warming Irrigation, Aeration, and Humic Acid on Yield, Quality, and GHG Emissions in Processing Tomatoes in Xinjiang
Agricultural greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise year after year, contributing significantly to global warming—an escalating crisis that demands urgent attention. In order to address this issue, it is crucial to investigate the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions from farmland and crop yield and quality through comprehensive regulation of the soil micro-environment by inputting water, fertilizer, gas, and heat. Therefore, we conducted field experiments in 2024 to examine the effects of different water, fertilizer, gas, and heat conditions on the yield, quality, greenhouse gas emissions, net global warming potential (NGWP), and greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) of processing tomatoes in Xinjiang, China. This study established two irrigation water temperatures (T0: the local irrigation water temperature, approximately 10–15 °C; and T1: warming irrigation, 20–25 °C), two humic acid application rates (H0: 0% and H1: 0.5%, % as a percentage of total fertilizer application), and three aeration methods (A0: no aeration, A1: Venturi aerated, and A2: micro–nano aerated) during the growth period. The results showed that the number of fruits per hectare (NP), vitamin C (VC) content, titratable acidity and lycopene content were all significantly increased with increasing temperature, application of 0.5% humic acid, and aeration. Warming has little effect on GHGI, while humic acid application and aeration have significant and extremely significant effects on GHGI. The GHGI of humic acid treatment was 7.70% lower than that of H0, and the GHGI of micro–nano aeration and Venturi aeration treatment was 18.95% and 6.85% lower than that of A0, respectively. We employed a comprehensive evaluation model that focused on overall differences to assess yield, quality, economic benefits, and environmental impact (GHGI, global warming potential). The optimal strategy identified comprised 20–25 °C irrigation, micro–nano aeration, and 0.5% humic acid, which collectively achieved the highest scores in yield, quality, and emission reduction. This study establishes a theoretical and technical foundation for the sustainable and efficient production of tomatoes in the arid regions of Northern Xinjiang.
Open AccessIntegrated Effects of Warming Irrigation, Aeration, and Humic Acid on Yield, Quality, and GHG Emissions in Processing Tomatoes in Xinjiang
Agricultural greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise year after year, contributing significantly to global warming—an escalating crisis that demands urgent attention. In order to address this issue, it is crucial to investigate the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions from farmland and crop yield and quality through comprehensive regulation of the soil micro-environment by inputting water, fertilizer, gas, and heat. Therefore, we conducted field experiments in 2024 to examine the effects of different water, fertilizer, gas, and heat conditions on the yield, quality, greenhouse gas emissions, net global warming potential (NGWP), and greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) of processing tomatoes in Xinjiang, China. This study established two irrigation water temperatures (T0: the local irrigation water temperature, approximately 10–15 °C; and T1: warming irrigation, 20–25 °C), two humic acid application rates (H0: 0% and H1: 0.5%, % as a percentage of total fertilizer application), and three aeration methods (A0: no aeration, A1: Venturi aerated, and A2: micro–nano aerated) during the growth period. The results showed that the number of fruits per hectare (NP), vitamin C (VC) content, titratable acidity and lycopene content were all significantly increased with increasing temperature, application of 0.5% humic acid, and aeration. Warming has little effect on GHGI, while humic acid application and aeration have significant and extremely significant effects on GHGI. The GHGI of humic acid treatment was 7.70% lower than that of H0, and the GHGI of micro–nano aeration and Venturi aeration treatment was 18.95% and 6.85% lower than that of A0, respectively. We employed a comprehensive evaluation model that focused on overall differences to assess yield, quality, economic benefits, and environmental impact (GHGI, global warming potential). The optimal strategy identified comprised 20–25 °C irrigation, micro–nano aeration, and 0.5% humic acid, which collectively achieved the highest scores in yield, quality, and emission reduction. This study establishes a theoretical and technical foundation for the sustainable and efficient production of tomatoes in the arid regions of Northern Xinjiang.