XYXinyi Yang

Xinyi Yang

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Xinyi Yang has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    An AI-Enabled Framework for Cacopsylla chinensis Monitoring and Population Dynamics Prediction

    by Ruijun Jing, Deyan Peng, Jingtong Xu, Zhengjie Zhao, Xinyi Yang, Yihai Yu, Liu Yang, Ruiyan Ma, Zhiguo Zhao

    The issue of pesticide and chemical residue in food has drawn increasing public attention, making effective control of plant pests and diseases a critical research focus in agriculture. Monitoring of pest populations is a key factor constraining the precision of pest management strategies. Low-cost and high-efficiency monitoring devices are highly desirable. To address these challenges, we focus on Cacopsylla chinensis and design a portable, AI-based detection device, along with an integrated online monitoring and forecasting system. First, to enhance the model’s capability for detecting small targets, we developed a backbone network based on the RepVit block and its variants. Additionally, we introduced a Dynamic Position Encoder module to improve feature position encoding. To further enhance detection performance, we adopt a Context Guide Fusion Module, which enables context-driven information guidance and adaptive feature adjustment. Second, a framework facilitates the development of an online monitoring system centered on Cacopsylla chinensis detection. The system incorporates a hybrid neural network model to establish the relationship between multiple environmental parameters and the Cacopsylla chinensis population, enabling trend prediction. We conduct feasibility validation experiments by comparing detection results with a manual survey. The experimental results show that the detection model achieves an accuracy of 87.4% for both test samples and edge devices. Furthermore, the population dynamics model yields a mean absolute error of 1.94% for the test dataset. These performance indicators fully meet the requirements of practical agricultural applications.