Elizabeth Blair

Supplementary Table 1. Representativeness of Study Participants.

Supplementary Figure 1. Progression free survival Kaplan-meier estimates for patients that rapidly clear ctHPV-DNA (≥95% ctHPV-DNA reduction) after cycles 1 and 2 (red) versus patients that do not achieve rapid ctHPV-DNA clearance after cycles 1 and 2 (blue).

Supplemental Table 3. Discordance between deep radiographic response (>50% tumor shrinkage per RECIST v1.1) and rapid ctHPV-DNA clearance (≥95% reduction) after 1 cycle.

Supplemental Table 2. Correlation coefficients (p-values) for ctHPV-DNA kinetics and radiographic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Purpose:Human papillomavirus–associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal carcinoma is associated with excellent survival, yet treatment drives substantial toxicity. Improved biomarkers are needed to select patients for de-escalated treatment. Circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPV-DNA) represents a promising noninvasive biomarker to gauge treatment response and surveil for disease recurrence.Patients and Methods: A prospective biomarker clinical trial of response-stratified de-escalation was conducted. Eligible patients with non-metastatic HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by risk/response-stratified de-escalation with transoral robotic surgery, de-escalated radiation with or without chemotherapy to 50 Gy, or standard chemoradiation to 70 Gy. Deep response (≥50% tumor shrinkage per RECIST v1.1) qualified patients for de-escalation. ctHPV-DNA was measured using HPV-SEQ in plasma at baseline, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and following treatment. The primary endpoint was the correlation of ctHPV-DNA kinetics and radiographic response.Results:Forty-six eligible patients were enrolled, and 488 ctHPV-DNA samples were analyzed (median 11 per patient). The median follow-up was 30 months, and five recurrences were observed (10.9%). Baseline ctHPV-DNA was detected in 95% of evaluable patients. Rapid early ctHPV-DNA clearance after one cycle of neoadjuvant therapy (≥95% reduction) predicted radiographic deep response (P = 0.04). Detection of ctHPV-DNA 3 months or later after treatment was associated with worse progression-free and overall survival (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of longitudinal ctHPV-DNA were 100%. The longest lead time from positive ctHPV-DNA to detection of recurrent disease was 25 months.Conclusions:Rapid early clearance of ctHPV-DNA during neoadjuvant therapy demonstrates utility in predicting response to treatment. Detectable ctHPV-DNA following treatment is predictive of both disease recurrence and worse survival.

Supplemental Table 4. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of detectable ctHPV-DNA at 12 weeks or later following treatment.

Purpose: Human papillomavirus–associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal carcinoma is associated with excellent survival, yet treatment drives substantial toxicity. Improved biomarkers are needed to select patients for de-escalated treatment. Circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPV-DNA) represents a promising noninvasive biomarker to gauge treatment response and surveil for disease recurrence. Patients and Methods: A prospective biomarker clinical trial of response-stratified de-escalation was conducted. Eligible patients with non-metastatic HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by risk/response-stratified de-escalation with transoral robotic surgery, de-escalated radiation with or without chemotherapy to 50 Gy, or standard chemoradiation to 70 Gy. Deep response (≥50% tumor shrinkage per RECIST v1.1) qualified patients for de-escalation. ctHPV-DNA was measured using HPV-SEQ in plasma at baseline, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and following treatment. The primary endpoint was the correlation of ctHPV-DNA kinetics and radiographic response. Results: Forty-six eligible patients were enrolled, and 488 ctHPV-DNA samples were analyzed (median 11 per patient). The median follow-up was 30 months, and five recurrences were observed (10.9%). Baseline ctHPV-DNA was detected in 95% of evaluable patients. Rapid early ctHPV-DNA clearance after one cycle of neoadjuvant therapy (≥95% reduction) predicted radiographic deep response (P = 0.04). Detection of ctHPV-DNA 3 months or later after treatment was associated with worse progression-free and overall survival (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of longitudinal ctHPV-DNA were 100%. The longest lead time from positive ctHPV-DNA to detection of recurrent disease was 25 months. Conclusions: Rapid early clearance of ctHPV-DNA during neoadjuvant therapy demonstrates utility in predicting response to treatment. Detectable ctHPV-DNA following treatment is predictive of both disease recurrence and worse survival.

Background and Aim: Retrospective analysis of the utility of adjuvant radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) and identify prognostic features for patients with high‐risk head and neck salivary gland cancers.Methods: From 1/1997 to 12/2017, 108 patients underwent surgery, and RT (n = 50) or CRT (n = 58) for positive lymph node(s), extracapsular extension, perineural invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive/close margin, and/or grade 3 disease. Outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan‐Meier method. Significant predictors identified through regression analyses were incorporated into multivariable regression (MVA). Toxicities were compared using chi‐square.Results: The median follow‐up was 52 months (range: 3‐226). The number of risk factors (RFs) between RT and CRT groups were: 0 to 1 (44% vs 7%), 2 to 3 (48% vs 41%), or 4 to 6 (8% vs 52%), respectively (P < .01). On MVA, stage 3 or 4 disease predicted worse outcomes including overall survival (HR 4.55, P = .01). Increasing number of RFs predicted worse disease‐free survival, distant metastasis‐free survival, and overall survival (2‐3 RFs: HR 3.38, P = .03; 4‐6 RFs: HR 5.78, P < .01), but not locoregional control (P = .54). So, adjuvant CRT may have provided comparable locoregional control for patients with more adverse features, but the CRT did not translate into improved distant control. There was no difference in acute or late grade 3+ toxicities, or parenteral nutrition (P = .98, P = .85, and P = .83), respectively.Conclusions: Adjuvant CRT provides adequate locoregional control in patients with more adverse RFs. The absolute number of RFs serves prognostic significance and should be considered in future prospective trials.