Rosa María Vilariño-Rodríguez
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Rosa María Vilariño-Rodríguez has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Cristina Rico-Romano
Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Dina Aslimani Amar
Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Fátima Martín-Hernán
Department of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University (UAX), Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Jesús Mena-Álvarez
Departments of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthetics, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid
1 shared publication - Juan Manuel Aragoneses
Department of Dental Research in Universidad Federico Henríquez y Carvajal (UFHEC), Santo Domingo 10107, Dominican Republic
1 shared publication - Pablo Garrido-Martínez
DDS, MsC, phD. Associate Professor, Department of Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry, University Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital La Luz, Madrid
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Pilot Study of the Shade Matching of Biomimetic Composite Resins in Posterior Dental Restorations: Randomised Clinical Trial
Cosmetic restorative dentistry focuses on restoring teeth affected by caries or trauma using materials that mimic natural teeth in shape, texture, and color. Composite resins, particularly nanofilled composites, are widely used due to their superior mechanical and aesthetic properties. Accurate tooth color selection is crucial, and methods include visual (shade guides) and instrumental (spectrophotometers, colorimeters, and intraoral scanners). Newer biomimetic composites, such as Admira Fusion 5 and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal, simplify shade selection through advanced optical technologies. A randomized clinical study involving 30 patients compared the color-matching accuracy of two biomimetic composite resins: Admira Fusion 5 (Voco) and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal (Kuraray). The study utilized the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer and the Primescan intraoral scanner. Patients were treated following standardized protocols, and shade accuracy was evaluated pre- and post-restoration using Cohen’s Kappa index. Admira Fusion 5 showed higher shade-matching accuracy, with good agreement between pre- and post-restoration measurements using both instruments. Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal demonstrated lower reproducibility in shade matching, particularly in posterior teeth, with lower agreement in pre- and post-tests. Instrumentation Comparison: Primescan showed slightly better performance than Easyshade, but both provided comparable results. In conclusions, universal composites may not always achieve optimal shade matching in posterior teeth. Layered composites provide better color adaptability. While digital instruments enhance shade accuracy, combining them with visual methods yields the best clinical outcomes. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to improve shade-matching techniques in aesthetic restorative dentistry.
Open AccessPilot Study of the Shade Matching of Biomimetic Composite Resins in Posterior Dental Restorations: Randomised Clinical Trial
Cosmetic restorative dentistry focuses on restoring teeth affected by caries or trauma using materials that mimic natural teeth in shape, texture, and color. Composite resins, particularly nanofilled composites, are widely used due to their superior mechanical and aesthetic properties. Accurate tooth color selection is crucial, and methods include visual (shade guides) and instrumental (spectrophotometers, colorimeters, and intraoral scanners). Newer biomimetic composites, such as Admira Fusion 5 and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal, simplify shade selection through advanced optical technologies. A randomized clinical study involving 30 patients compared the color-matching accuracy of two biomimetic composite resins: Admira Fusion 5 (Voco) and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal (Kuraray). The study utilized the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer and the Primescan intraoral scanner. Patients were treated following standardized protocols, and shade accuracy was evaluated pre- and post-restoration using Cohen’s Kappa index. Admira Fusion 5 showed higher shade-matching accuracy, with good agreement between pre- and post-restoration measurements using both instruments. Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal demonstrated lower reproducibility in shade matching, particularly in posterior teeth, with lower agreement in pre- and post-tests. Instrumentation Comparison: Primescan showed slightly better performance than Easyshade, but both provided comparable results. In conclusions, universal composites may not always achieve optimal shade matching in posterior teeth. Layered composites provide better color adaptability. While digital instruments enhance shade accuracy, combining them with visual methods yields the best clinical outcomes. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to improve shade-matching techniques in aesthetic restorative dentistry.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2025
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Dentistry
- Vol. 2025 (1) , 8863750
A Cross‐Cultural Examination of Common Root Canal Mistakes in Spanish Dental School
Introduction: Endodontic treatments require a high level of manual skill and operative independence, which is why preclinical training and the development of appropriate educational programs are vital. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of endodontic treatments and the influence of nationality on undergraduate academic performance at a Spanish dental school with a large proportion of international students. Material and Methods: A cross‐sectional study was carried out on students of the Dental Therapeutic Pathology II subject at the Faculty of Dentistry in the 2022–2023 academic year. Two independent evaluators evaluated the quality of the treatments, and errors made during the treatment were identified. The chi‐square test assessed the association between the errors committed in root canal treatment and nationality. Results: A total of 319 students were evaluated. The most frequent nationality was French (57.4%), followed by Italian (22.9%), Spanish (16.0%), and others (3.8%). Treatment of multiple ducts was the most performed (75.86%). The French carried out the highest number of treatments (73.22%). The most frequent error was identified in the design of the camera aperture. There were no statistically significant differences between the number of errors and nationality. Conclusions: A growing internationalization of students has been identified. Despite cultural and linguistic differences, a common tendency to make errors in the design of openings in endodontic treatments was observed in all groups. French students stood out with superior academic performance.
- 1 January 2025
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Dentistry
- Vol. 2025 (1) , 8863750
Open AccessA Cross‐Cultural Examination of Common Root Canal Mistakes in Spanish Dental School
Introduction: Endodontic treatments require a high level of manual skill and operative independence, which is why preclinical training and the development of appropriate educational programs are vital. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of endodontic treatments and the influence of nationality on undergraduate academic performance at a Spanish dental school with a large proportion of international students. Material and Methods: A cross‐sectional study was carried out on students of the Dental Therapeutic Pathology II subject at the Faculty of Dentistry in the 2022–2023 academic year. Two independent evaluators evaluated the quality of the treatments, and errors made during the treatment were identified. The chi‐square test assessed the association between the errors committed in root canal treatment and nationality. Results: A total of 319 students were evaluated. The most frequent nationality was French (57.4%), followed by Italian (22.9%), Spanish (16.0%), and others (3.8%). Treatment of multiple ducts was the most performed (75.86%). The French carried out the highest number of treatments (73.22%). The most frequent error was identified in the design of the camera aperture. There were no statistically significant differences between the number of errors and nationality. Conclusions: A growing internationalization of students has been identified. Despite cultural and linguistic differences, a common tendency to make errors in the design of openings in endodontic treatments was observed in all groups. French students stood out with superior academic performance.