Navkiran Randhawa
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Navkiran Randhawa has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ahamed Khalyfa
Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
1 shared publication - Haoran Peng
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
1 shared publication - Kamran Ayub
Gastroenterology, Silver Cross Hospital, New Lenox, United States
1 shared publication - Mahnoor Inamullah
Southwest Gastroenterology, Oak Lawn, IL 60453, USA
1 shared publication - Raahi Patel
Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscan Health, Olympia Fields, IL 60461, USA
1 shared publication - Rahil Desai
Department of Gastroenterology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 June 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (12) , 4298
Different Approaches to Extracting Proximally Migrated or Broken and Retained Pancreatic Stents
Background: Pancreatic stents (PSs) play a crucial role in the management of pancreatic duct obstructions, particularly in the context of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, stent migration remains a significant complication, leading to risks such as pancreatitis, pancreatic duct stenosis, and abscess formation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of various endoscopic techniques for retrieving proximally migrated or broken pancreatic stents, highlighting optimal strategies for improving patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective multicenter review was conducted across six hospitals from 2016 to 2024. Patients with proximally migrated or broken pancreatic stents referred for endoscopic retrieval after failed attempts at other facilities were included. Demographic data, stent characteristics, and retrieval techniques were analyzed. Endoscopic methods included SpyGlass forceps, SpyGlass baskets, Soehendra retriever stents, balloon sweeps, flower baskets, and extension pancreatic sphincterotomy. Procedural success, retrieval times, and post-procedural outcomes were assessed. Results: Twelve patients underwent endoscopic retrieval, including two with broken stents. All procedures were successful, with retrieval times averaging 30 to 45 min. Two patients developed pancreatic duct narrowing, requiring balloon dilation. All patients had new stents placed to maintain duct patency, and no major complications were observed. Follow-up evaluations confirmed complete resolution of migration-related issues, with all stents removed. Conclusions: Endoscopic retrieval of migrated pancreatic stents is highly effective, with specialized techniques ensuring a 100% success rate in this study. Early intervention and the selection of appropriate retrieval methods are critical in minimizing complications. Further research is needed to refine retrieval strategies and standardize protocols to enhance clinical outcomes.
- 17 June 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (12) , 4298
Open AccessDifferent Approaches to Extracting Proximally Migrated or Broken and Retained Pancreatic Stents
Background: Pancreatic stents (PSs) play a crucial role in the management of pancreatic duct obstructions, particularly in the context of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, stent migration remains a significant complication, leading to risks such as pancreatitis, pancreatic duct stenosis, and abscess formation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of various endoscopic techniques for retrieving proximally migrated or broken pancreatic stents, highlighting optimal strategies for improving patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective multicenter review was conducted across six hospitals from 2016 to 2024. Patients with proximally migrated or broken pancreatic stents referred for endoscopic retrieval after failed attempts at other facilities were included. Demographic data, stent characteristics, and retrieval techniques were analyzed. Endoscopic methods included SpyGlass forceps, SpyGlass baskets, Soehendra retriever stents, balloon sweeps, flower baskets, and extension pancreatic sphincterotomy. Procedural success, retrieval times, and post-procedural outcomes were assessed. Results: Twelve patients underwent endoscopic retrieval, including two with broken stents. All procedures were successful, with retrieval times averaging 30 to 45 min. Two patients developed pancreatic duct narrowing, requiring balloon dilation. All patients had new stents placed to maintain duct patency, and no major complications were observed. Follow-up evaluations confirmed complete resolution of migration-related issues, with all stents removed. Conclusions: Endoscopic retrieval of migrated pancreatic stents is highly effective, with specialized techniques ensuring a 100% success rate in this study. Early intervention and the selection of appropriate retrieval methods are critical in minimizing complications. Further research is needed to refine retrieval strategies and standardize protocols to enhance clinical outcomes.