ASAodi Shi

Aodi Shi

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Aodi Shi has a total of 1 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rolling Bearings Based on an Improved U-Net and a Multi-Dimensional Hybrid Gated Attention Mechanism

    by Hengdi Wang, Aodi Shi

    In practical scenarios, rolling bearing vibration signals suffer from detail loss, and information loss occurs during feature dimensionality reduction and fusion, leading to inaccurate life prediction results. To address these issues, this paper first proposes a method for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of bearings, which combines an improved U-Net for enhancing vibration signals and a multi-dimensional hybrid gated attention mechanism (MHGAM) for dynamic feature fusion. The enhanced U-Net effectively suppresses the loss of signal details, while the MHGAM adaptively constructs health indices through multi-dimensional weighting, significantly improving prediction accuracy. Initially, the improved U-Net is utilized for signal preprocessing. By comprehensively considering both channel and spatial dimensions, the MHGAM dynamically assigns fusion weights across different dimensions to construct a health index. Subsequently, the health index is used as input for the Bi-GRU network model to obtain the remaining life prediction results. Finally, comparative analyses between the proposed method and other RUL prediction methods are conducted using the IEEE PHM 2012 bearing dataset (Condition 1: rotational speed 1800 r/min with radial load 4000 N; Condition 2: rotational speed 1650 r/min with radial load 4200 N) and engineering test data (rotational speed 1800 r/min with radial load 4000 N). Experimental results from the IEEE PHM 2012 bearing dataset indicate that this method achieves a low mean root mean square error (RMSE = 0.0504) and mean absolute error (MAE = 0.0239). The engineering test verification results demonstrate that the mean values of RMSE and MAE for this method are 7.8% lower than those of the CNN-BiGRU benchmark model and 14.6% lower than those of the TCN-BiGRU model, respectively. In terms of comprehensive prediction performance scores, the average scores improve by 7.8% and 9.3 percentage points compared with the two benchmark models, respectively. Under various test conditions, the prediction results of this method exhibit commendable comprehensive performance, significantly enhancing the prediction accuracy of bearing remaining useful life.