Alin Pandea

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSKUS) is increasingly used to assess masticatory-muscle morphology and mechanical properties, but its clinical interpretability in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and bruxism remains uncertain. We systematically reviewed quantitative B-mode, elastographic, functional, diagnostic, and measurement-property evidence. The final pre-submission search combined PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection, with supplementary discovery in Europe PMC and Lens, through 20 August 2026 (PROSPERO CRD420261481058). Random-effects meta-analyses used restricted maximum likelihood (REML) with Hartung-Knapp inference. Resting masseter thickness showed no consistent case-control difference (k=14; MD -0.19 mm, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.40; I²=88.9%), nor did contracted masseter thickness (k=11; MD -0.06 mm, 95% CI -1.16 to 1.03; I²=95.9%). Anterior temporalis thickness remained inconclusive at rest (k=5; MD 0.33 mm, 95% CI -0.59 to 1.25; I²=83.4%) and during contraction (k=5; MD -0.05 mm, 95% CI -1.59 to 1.49; I²=94.5%). Resting masseter stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography remained higher in clinical/bruxism groups (k=4; Hedges' g 1.80, 95% CI 0.15 to 3.44; I²=83.5%). Certainty was very low for all pooled outcomes. MSKUS is currently better supported for adjunctive phenotyping and longitudinal monitoring than as a stand-alone diagnostic test.

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) exhibit a marked female predominance, suggesting a potential role for estrogen in their pathophysiology. However, evidence linking estrogen status to TMD remains inconsistent. Objective: To systematically review the association between estrogen-related factors and TMD prevalence and clinical presentation in women. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched through September 2025. Observational studies evaluating hormonal contraceptive use, menopausal status, menstrual cycle variation, pregnancy, or estrogen receptor polymorphisms in women with TMD were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Due to substantial heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including six clinical studies involving 2735 participants and one mechanistic supportive study. Moderate-certainty evidence suggested associations between hormonal contraceptive use, menopausal/climacteric status, and increased TMD risk or symptom severity. Additional low-certainty evidence supported associations involving menstrual cycle variation, pregnancy, and estrogen receptor polymorphisms. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that hormonal factors may influence TMD risk and symptom presentation in women. However, heterogeneity in definitions of hormonal exposure and diagnostic criteria limits definitive conclusions. Further prospective studies using standardized diagnostic protocols and real-time biochemically validated hormonal assessments correlated with clinical symptoms are needed.

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) exhibit a marked female predominance, suggesting a potential role for estrogen in their pathophysiology. However, the evidence linking estrogen status to TMD risk and symptom severity remains inconsistent across studies. Objective: To systematically review and synthesize the available evidence on the association between estrogen status—including hormonal contraceptive use, menopausal status, menstrual cycle variation, pregnancy, and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms—and the prevalence and clinical features of TMD in women. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted through September 2025. Observational studies involving women diagnosed with TMD using validated diagnostic criteria (RDC/TMD, DC/TMD, or equivalent) and reporting estrogen-related exposures were included. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Due to heterogeneity in exposure definitions and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was performed. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to insufficient homogeneity across studies. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising six clinical studies involving 2,735 participants and one mechanistic supportive study involving 18 participants. Two high-quality clinical studies—a prospective cohort and a cross-sectional study—reported quantitative effect estimates: hormonal contraceptive use was associated with an increased risk of first-onset TMD (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13–1.66) and concurrent TMD symptoms (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06–1.35), while climacteric status was associated with increased odds of TMJ palpation pain (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.12–6.21), crepitus (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.13–7.56), and degenerative joint disease (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.05–4.91). Additional moderate-quality studies provided qualitative evidence supporting associations between menopausal status and TMD prevalence, menstrual cycle–related symptom variation, pregnancy-related symptom modulation, and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms with TMD susceptibility. According to GRADE criteria, the certainty of evidence was rated as moderate for hormonal contraceptive use and menopausal/climacteric status, and low to very low for the remaining exposure categories due to inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that hormonal factors, particularly hormonal contraceptive use and menopausal status, are associated with TMD risk and symptom presentation. However, the limited number of high-quality studies, heterogeneity in exposure definitions, and variability in diagnostic criteria constrain definitive conclusions. Further well-designed prospective cohort studies with standardized diagnostic protocols and biochemically validated hormonal assessments are needed to clarify causal relationships and inform clinical decision-making.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a common complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), significantly impairs postural control and increases fall risk due to sensory and motor nerve dysfunction. While conventional rehabilitation is widely used, the effectiveness of technology-assisted balance training remains underexplored. This quasi-experimental study aimed to compare the impact of Biodex Balance System (BBS)-based training versus traditional exercises on balance and coordination in patients with DPN. Thirty patients with T2DM and clinically confirmed DPN were allocated into two groups (n = 15 per group): the intervention group (BBS training) and the control group (traditional exercises). Both groups trained for 8 weeks. Static balance was assessed using stability indices and clinical balance tests. Statistical analysis included paired and independent t-tests, Shapiro–Wilk tests for normality, and Cohen’s d for effect size. The BBS group demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all balance measures compared to the control group. For the most challenging condition (unstable surface, eyes closed), the mean balance index improved by 0.66° (p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 14.25). Substantial improvements were also observed for the stable surface (eyes open: Δ = 0.34°, p < 0.001, d = 4.01) and unstable surface (eyes open: Δ = 0.23°, p < 0.001, d = 7.46). Control group gains were modest and less consistent. Balance training using the Biodex Balance System significantly enhances static balance and postural control in patients with diabetic neuropathy, outperforming traditional rehabilitation methods. These findings support integrating the BBS into structured diabetic care programs to reduce fall risk and improve functional stability.