Mariana Lara Zambetta

Background: Currently, there is a considerable number of studies addressing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of different stroke-related outcomes. We aimed to promote a broad view of the outcomes studied and what are the opportune outcomes to be studied involving this therapeutic strategy for the treatment of post-stroke complications. Methods: This is a scoping review that followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two investigators conducted independent searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase till July 2025. Randomized clinical trials and preclinical studies using invasive or non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation conducted with a population diagnosed with stroke were included. Results: Forty-one experimental studies and sixteen clinical trials were included. The outcomes found were neuroprotection; motor, functional, and cognitive rehabilitation; dysphagia; comparison of different stimulation intensities; safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the non-invasive approach; comparison between transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation (tcVNS); and comparison between two models of ischemia (permanent and transient). Preclinical studies mostly investigated molecular elements involved in neuroprotection, neuroinflammation, and cellular apoptosis, while clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of this technique used for rehabilitation and its comparison or combination with other techniques remain scarce. Conclusions: Most studies investigating the effects of VNS on different post-stroke outcomes are experimental studies. Clinical studies are still scarce and with limited analysis of outcomes.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder primarily characterized by motor impairments resulting from dopaminergic neuron degeneration in the substantia nigra. However, PD is increasingly recognized as a multisystem disorder, where non-motor symptoms such as cognitive impairment, mood disturbances, sleep disorders, and autonomic dysfunction significantly impact patients’ quality of life. These non-motor symptoms often exhibit poor responsiveness to traditional dopaminergic therapies, underscoring a critical gap in current treatment strategies. Our systematic review investigates established methods of PD induction in rodent models and evaluates the methodologies used to assess non-motor symptoms. The review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the Cochrane handbook. Thirty-two studies from 832 articles were included. The studies were characterized by MPTP, 6-OHDA, and rotenone. Our results indicate that there was considerable heterogeneity in behavioral and motor tests, which poses challenges for data comparability and highlights the lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate modeling strategies for specific PD-related behavioral outcomes. All three models demonstrated behavioral changes consistent with dopaminergic impairment when compared to control groups. MPTP-induced models showed significant non-motor deficits across various tests, except in social recognition and novelty-suppressed feeding. The 6-OHDA model consistently produced non-motor impairments, supporting its utility in replicating PD-like neurotoxicity. Rotenone-treated animals exhibited reduced social interaction, decreased sucrose preference, and increased immobility in behavioral assays, further supporting its validity. Overall, our findings indicate that these neurotoxin-based models are effective in reproducing non-motor symptoms of PD, though methodological heterogeneity highlights the need for greater standardization in future preclinical research.