Akio Matsumoto
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Akio Matsumoto has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Akira Iwaya
Department of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata 950-1197, Japan
1 shared publication - Atsushi Nishimura
Department of Surgery, Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan
1 shared publication - Daisuke Yamai
Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
1 shared publication - Hidehito Oyanagi
Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
1 shared publication - Hikaru Ozeki
Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
1 shared publication - Hiroshi Ichikawa
Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Discordance Between Radiological and Pathological Responses to Pembrolizumab in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Precision Oncology
Background/Objectives: Pembrolizumab demonstrates a high response rate in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with responses often sustained even after treatment cessation. However, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in clinically responding cases remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the radiological and pathological responses in patients with dMMR mCRC who responded to pembrolizumab. Methods: This retrospective study included 27 patients with dMMR mCRC treated with pembrolizumab. The radiological response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1 criteria. The pathological response was evaluated in patients who underwent metastasectomy, with pCR defined as the absence of residual cancer cells. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the cohort was 19 months. Among the 27 patients, 3 achieved clinical complete response (cCR), and 10 had clinical partial response (cPR), resulting in a response rate of 48%. All three patients with cCR maintained their responses without metastasectomy (2-year PFS: 100%). Among patients with cPR, eight maintained their responses, while two experienced progression (2-year PFS: 75%). Five patients with cPR underwent curative-intent metastasectomy, and four of them (80%) achieved pCR. Thus, at least 40% of patients with cPR in this cohort had no residual cancer histologically. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the significant discordance between the radiological and pathological responses to pembrolizumab in dMMR mCRC patients, with 80% of those with cPR achieving pCR upon metastasectomy. These observations highlight the need for improved response assessment methods for precision immunotherapy.
Open AccessDiscordance Between Radiological and Pathological Responses to Pembrolizumab in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Precision Oncology
Background/Objectives: Pembrolizumab demonstrates a high response rate in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with responses often sustained even after treatment cessation. However, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in clinically responding cases remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the radiological and pathological responses in patients with dMMR mCRC who responded to pembrolizumab. Methods: This retrospective study included 27 patients with dMMR mCRC treated with pembrolizumab. The radiological response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1 criteria. The pathological response was evaluated in patients who underwent metastasectomy, with pCR defined as the absence of residual cancer cells. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the cohort was 19 months. Among the 27 patients, 3 achieved clinical complete response (cCR), and 10 had clinical partial response (cPR), resulting in a response rate of 48%. All three patients with cCR maintained their responses without metastasectomy (2-year PFS: 100%). Among patients with cPR, eight maintained their responses, while two experienced progression (2-year PFS: 75%). Five patients with cPR underwent curative-intent metastasectomy, and four of them (80%) achieved pCR. Thus, at least 40% of patients with cPR in this cohort had no residual cancer histologically. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the significant discordance between the radiological and pathological responses to pembrolizumab in dMMR mCRC patients, with 80% of those with cPR achieving pCR upon metastasectomy. These observations highlight the need for improved response assessment methods for precision immunotherapy.