Kristen Billick
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kristen Billick has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Allan L. Klein
Cleveland Clinic
1 shared publication Einar Gude
Department of Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway (E.G.).
1 shared publicationEusebio García-Izquierdo
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (E.G.-I.).
1 shared publicationFaraz H. Khan
Institute for Surgical Research, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and University of Oslo, Norway (O.A.S., F.H.K., Ø.S.A.).
1 shared publication- Hossam Lababidi
Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX (H.L., W.R., S.F.N.).
1 shared publication J. Thomas Heywood
Scripps Clinic and La Jolla Hospital in La Jolla, CA (K.B., R.C.M., J.T.H.).
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited Papers
- 19 August 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 152 (7) , 424-435
New Algorithm for Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure by Echocardiography
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of whether dyspnea has a cardiac cause is essential. Guidelines from 2016 were reported to result in a high incidence of indeterminate left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. We sought to validate a new algorithm for the estimation of LV filling pressure (LVFP) in a multicenter study, with the objective of decreasing the yield of indeterminate filling pressure and increasing accuracy. METHODS: In an observational study, echocardiography was performed in 951 patients referred for cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic measurements included mitral inflow, pulmonary vein and tissue Doppler mitral annulus velocities, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, assessment of mean right atrial pressure, biplane LV and left atrial volumes, and LV and left atrial strain. A stepwise approach was applied in a new algorithm for estimation of LVFP, whereby pressure >15 mm Hg was considered abnormally elevated. The first step included mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (e′), the ratio of mitral early flow velocity to e′, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. With concordant findings in all 3 variables, conclusions about LVFP could be reached. In case of discordant or incomplete variables, left atrial reservoir strain, left atrial maximum volume index, isovolumic relaxation time, and pulmonary vein flow were analyzed in a second step. In the presence of ≥1 abnormal measurement in the second step, the conclusion of elevated LVFP could be reached. RESULTS: Only 2 patients had indeterminate LVFP as per the new algorithm versus 38 applying 2016 guidelines ( P P P P P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new algorithm increases the feasibility of estimating LVFP and has good accuracy with incremental value when natriuretic peptides are considered.
- 19 August 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 152 (7) , 424-435
Top Cited PapersNew Algorithm for Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure by Echocardiography
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of whether dyspnea has a cardiac cause is essential. Guidelines from 2016 were reported to result in a high incidence of indeterminate left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. We sought to validate a new algorithm for the estimation of LV filling pressure (LVFP) in a multicenter study, with the objective of decreasing the yield of indeterminate filling pressure and increasing accuracy. METHODS: In an observational study, echocardiography was performed in 951 patients referred for cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic measurements included mitral inflow, pulmonary vein and tissue Doppler mitral annulus velocities, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, assessment of mean right atrial pressure, biplane LV and left atrial volumes, and LV and left atrial strain. A stepwise approach was applied in a new algorithm for estimation of LVFP, whereby pressure >15 mm Hg was considered abnormally elevated. The first step included mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (e′), the ratio of mitral early flow velocity to e′, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. With concordant findings in all 3 variables, conclusions about LVFP could be reached. In case of discordant or incomplete variables, left atrial reservoir strain, left atrial maximum volume index, isovolumic relaxation time, and pulmonary vein flow were analyzed in a second step. In the presence of ≥1 abnormal measurement in the second step, the conclusion of elevated LVFP could be reached. RESULTS: Only 2 patients had indeterminate LVFP as per the new algorithm versus 38 applying 2016 guidelines ( P P P P P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new algorithm increases the feasibility of estimating LVFP and has good accuracy with incremental value when natriuretic peptides are considered.