Ruixia Liu

Skywells are crucial for climate regulation in traditional Chinese dwelling architecture, exhibiting significant variations across climatic regions. This study focuses on humid–hot China, using Huangshan, to explore skywell parameters’ impact on thermal comfort and energy efficiency. Field research on 24 buildings in the World Heritage Site Xidi, Hong Villages, and Chinese Historical Pingshan Village, combined with Grasshopper’s Ladybug tool, established a parametric model. Using orthogonal design, performance simulation, and Python-based machine learning, six morphological parameters were analyzed: width-to-length ratio, height-to-width ratio, orientation, hall depth, wing width, and shading width. After NSGA-II multi-objective optimization, the summer Percentage of Time Comfortable (P_TC) increased by 5.3%, 38.14 h; the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) relatively improved by 2%; energy consumption decreased by 8.6%, 0.14 kWh/m²; and the useful daylight illuminance increased by 28%, 128.4 h. This confirms the climate adaptability of courtyard-style buildings in humid–hot China and identifies optimized skywell parameters within the study scope.

China’s urban residential building stock is extensive and spans a wide range of construction periods. With the continuous enhancement of building energy efficiency standards, the chronological characteristics and variability of residential building envelopes are evident. Through field research and typological analysis of residential buildings in Jinan, a cold region of China, three construction eras were classified: Period I (1980–1985), Period II (1986–1995), and Period III (1996–2005). Building performance and economic benefits across these periods are modeled using Rhino 7.3 and Grasshopper. The NSGA-II algorithm, as the core of Wallacei2.7, is employed for multi-objective optimization. Through K-means clustering, TOPSIS comprehensive ranking, and Pearson correlation analysis, the optimized processes and solutions are provided for urban residential renovation decisions in different periods and target preferences. The results show that the optimal comprehensive performance solutions for Period I, Period II, and Period III achieve energy savings of 40.92%, 29.62%, and 15.81%, respectively, and increase annual indoor comfort hours by 872.64 h/year, 633.57 h/year, and 564.11 h/year. For Period I and II residential buildings, the most effective energy efficiency retrofit measures include increasing exterior wall and roof insulation, replacing exterior window types, and reducing exterior window k-value. The overall trend in energy savings rates and economic benefits across the three periods shows a decline. For Period III residential buildings, systematic strategies, such as solar thermal collector systems and photovoltaic technology, are required to enhance energy efficiency.