Carla de Gregorio-Bermejo

Objectives: Pelvic tumor resections demand high surgical precision to ensure clear margins while preserving function. Although patient-specific instruments (PSIs) improve osteotomy accuracy, positioning errors remain a limitation. This study evaluates the feasibility, accuracy, and usability of a novel dual-function augmented reality (AR) system for intraoperative guidance in PSI positioning and osteotomy execution using a head-mounted display (HMD). The system provides dual-function support by assisting both PSI placement and osteotomy execution. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric hemipelves underwent AR-assisted internal hemipelvectomy, using customized 3D-printed PSIs and a new in-house AR software integrated into an HMD. Angular and translational deviations between planned and executed osteotomies were measured using postoperative CT analysis. Absolute angular errors were computed from plane normals; translational deviation was assessed as maximum error at the osteotomy corner point in both sagittal (pitch) and coronal (roll) planes. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess intra-workflow cumulative error. Results: The mean absolute angular deviation was 5.11 ± 1.43°, with 86.66% of osteotomies within acceptable thresholds. Maximum pitch and roll deviations were 4.53 ± 1.32 mm and 2.79 ± 0.72 mm, respectively, with 93.33% and 100% of osteotomies meeting translational accuracy criteria. Wilcoxon analysis showed significantly lower angular error when comparing final executed planes to intermediate AR-displayed planes (p < 0.05), supporting improved PSI positioning accuracy with AR guidance. Surgeons rated the system highly (mean satisfaction ≥ 4.0) for usability and clinical utility. Conclusions: This cadaveric study confirms the feasibility and precision of an HMD-based AR system for PSI-guided pelvic osteotomies. The system demonstrated strong accuracy and high surgeon acceptance, highlighting its potential for clinical adoption in complex oncologic procedures.

Objectives: This pre-clinical feasibility study evaluates the accuracy of a novel augmented reality-based (AR-based) guidance technology using head-mounted displays (HMDs) for the placement of patient-specific instruments (PSIs)—also referred to as surgical guides—and osteotomy performance in pelvic tumour resections. The goal is to improve PSI placement accuracy and osteotomy execution while assessing user perception and workflow efficiency. Methods: The study was conducted on ten 3D-printed pelvic phantoms derived from CT scans of cadaveric specimens. Custom PSIs were designed and printed to guide osteotomies at the supraacetabular, symphysial, and ischial regions. An AR application was developed for the HoloLens 2 HMD to display PSI location and cutting planes. The workflow included manual supraacetabular PSI placement, AR-guided placement of the other PSIs and osteotomy execution. Postoperative CT scans were analysed to measure angular and distance errors in PSI placement and osteotomies. Task times and user feedback were also recorded. Results: The mean angular deviation for PSI placement was 2.20°, with a mean distance error of 1.19 mm (95% CI: 0.86 to 1.52 mm). Osteotomies showed an overall mean angular deviation of 3.73° compared to planned cuts, all within the predefined threshold of less than 5°. AR-assisted guidance added less than two minutes per procedure. User feedback highlighted the intuitive interface and high usability, especially for visualising cutting planes. Conclusions: Integrating AR through HMDs is a feasible and accurate method for enhancing PSI placement and osteotomy performance in pelvic tumour resections. The system provides reliable guidance even in cases of PSI failure and adds minimal time to the surgical workflow while significantly improving accuracy. Further validation in cadaveric models is needed to ensure its clinical applicability.