Miha Sustersic

Background and Objectives: Transcatheter heart valve (THV) selection is challenging as self-expanding valves (SEVs) are associated with lower post-procedural mean aortic gradients, while balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) have lower rates of paravalvular leak (PVL) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). We aimed to compare the 30-day and 1-year outcomes following Myval BEV (Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, Gujarat, India) and intra-annular Portico SEV (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) implantation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from the all-comer TAVI registry of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, from October 2017 to August 2023. Safety and efficacy outcomes following Myval BEV and Portico SEV implantation were compared overall and after propensity score matching. Results: Of the total 1152 THVs implanted, 97 patients (8%) received a Myval BEV and 47 (4%) a Portico SEV. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between the two patient cohorts regarding 30-day (Myval 0.0% vs. Portico 2.9%, p = 1.000) and 1-year mortality (Myval 0.0% vs. Portico 5.9%, p = 0.492). Likewise, the rates of new PPI, device failure (mean aortic gradient and more than mild PVL), and periprocedural in-hospital complications were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of two intra-annular THVs, the Myval BEV was associated with comparable short- and mid-term outcomes as the Portico SEV.

Background: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) who undergo complete revascularization (CR) have a more favorable prognosis than those who receive incomplete revascularization (IR), as evidenced by recent randomized controlled trials. Despite the absence of a survival benefit associated with CR in these trials, positive outcomes were ascribed to combined endpoints, such as repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven rehospitalization. In light of the significant burden that rehospitalization from STEMI imposes on healthcare systems, we examined the long-term effects of CR on ischemia-driven rehospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in STEMI patients with MVD. Methods: In our retrospective study, we included patients with STEMI and MVD who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between 1 January 2009, and 11 April 2011. The combined endpoint was ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality, with a minimum follow-up period of six years. Results: We included 235 participants who underwent CR (N = 70) or IR (N = 165) at index hospitalization, with a median follow-up time of 7 years (interquartile range 6.0–8.2). The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the IR group than in the CR group (47.3% vs. 32.9%, log-rank p = 0.025), driven by CV mortality (23.6% vs. 12.9%, log-rank p = 0.047), as there was no difference in ischemia-driven rehospitalization rate (log-rank p = 0.206). Ischemia-driven rehospitalization did not influence CV mortality in the CR group (p = 0.49), while it significantly impacted CV mortality in the IR group (p = 0.03). After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in CV mortality between CR and IR groups (p = 0.622). Predictors of the combined endpoint included age (p = 0.014), diabetes (p = 0.006), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.001), cardiogenic shock at presentation (p = 0.003), chronic total occlusion (CTO) (p = 0.046), and ischemia-driven rehospitalization (p = 0.0001). Significant risk factors for the combined endpoint were cardiogenic shock at presentation (p < 0.001), stage 4 kidney failure (p = 0.001), age over 70 years (p = 0.004), female gender (p = 0.008), and residual SYNTAX I score > 5.5 (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Patients with STEMI and MVD who underwent CR had a lower combined endpoint of ischemia-driven rehospitalizations and CV mortality than IR patients, but after adjustments for confounders, the true determinants of the combined endpoint and risk factors for the combined endpoint were independent of the revascularization method.