Lukas Schausberger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lukas Schausberger has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aleksandra Radovanović Spurnić
Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
1 shared publication - Benedikt Treml
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Christoph Oberleitner
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Daniel Schwaiger
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, F.-Pregl-Str. 3, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication - Dragana Jadzic
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Pain Therapy Service, Cagliari University, 09100 Cagliari, Italy
1 shared publication - Nicole Innerhofer
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
- Vol. 12 (7) , 267
Activated Clotting Time and Haemostatic Complications in Patients Receiving ECMO Support: A Systematic Review
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires systemic anticoagulation to prevent clotting, typically using unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, anticoagulation carries a bleeding risk, necessitating monitoring. Activated clotting time (ACT) is a commonly used monitoring tool for UFH anticoagulation. However, systematized evidence linking ACT monitoring with haemostatic complications (bleeding and thrombosis) is missing. Methods: A systematic review (Scopus and PubMed, up to 13 July 2024) including studies reporting on the patients receiving ECMO support with UFH anticoagulation monitored using ACT was performed. Results: A total of 3536 publications were identified, of which 30 (2379 patients) were included in the final review. Thirteen studies found no significant association between ACT values and haemorrhage, while four studies suggested a relationship between elevated ACT levels and bleeding events. Eight studies demonstrated no association between ACT values and the occurrence of thrombosis. Major bleeding was most common (49%, 13 studies with 501 events), while the pooled rate of thrombosis was 25% (16 studies with 309 events) and in-hospital mortality was 51% (17 studies, 693/1390 patients). Conclusions: Despite advancements in ECMO, the optimal approach for anticoagulation monitoring remains undefined. Most studies in this review did not establish a significant relationship between ACT levels and haemostatic complications. Based on the current evidence, ACT does not appear to be a reliable tool for monitoring anticoagulation in patients receiving ECMO, and alternative methods should be considered.
- 13 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
- Vol. 12 (7) , 267
Open AccessActivated Clotting Time and Haemostatic Complications in Patients Receiving ECMO Support: A Systematic Review
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires systemic anticoagulation to prevent clotting, typically using unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, anticoagulation carries a bleeding risk, necessitating monitoring. Activated clotting time (ACT) is a commonly used monitoring tool for UFH anticoagulation. However, systematized evidence linking ACT monitoring with haemostatic complications (bleeding and thrombosis) is missing. Methods: A systematic review (Scopus and PubMed, up to 13 July 2024) including studies reporting on the patients receiving ECMO support with UFH anticoagulation monitored using ACT was performed. Results: A total of 3536 publications were identified, of which 30 (2379 patients) were included in the final review. Thirteen studies found no significant association between ACT values and haemorrhage, while four studies suggested a relationship between elevated ACT levels and bleeding events. Eight studies demonstrated no association between ACT values and the occurrence of thrombosis. Major bleeding was most common (49%, 13 studies with 501 events), while the pooled rate of thrombosis was 25% (16 studies with 309 events) and in-hospital mortality was 51% (17 studies, 693/1390 patients). Conclusions: Despite advancements in ECMO, the optimal approach for anticoagulation monitoring remains undefined. Most studies in this review did not establish a significant relationship between ACT levels and haemostatic complications. Based on the current evidence, ACT does not appear to be a reliable tool for monitoring anticoagulation in patients receiving ECMO, and alternative methods should be considered.