Mohammad Ebrahim Astaneh
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Mohammad Ebrahim Astaneh has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Narges Fereydouni
Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center Fasa University of Medical Sciences Fasa Iran
3 shared publications Ahemad Hussen
Department of Computers Techniques Engineering, College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq
1 shared publication- Ahmed Fekry Salman
Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19111, Jordan
1 shared publication Arshdeep Singh
Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India
1 shared publication- Ashish Singh Chauhan
Uttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of research and innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
1 shared publication Asokan Vasudevan
Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Regenerative Therapy
- Vol. 32, 101119
Stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted constructs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration: Shape-morphing mechanisms, cell-laden bioink engineering, and preclinical outcomes
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Regenerative Therapy
- Vol. 32, 101119
Open AccessStimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted constructs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration: Shape-morphing mechanisms, cell-laden bioink engineering, and preclinical outcomes
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
- Vol. 399 (6) , 7799-7834
Fish-derived biomaterials in bone tissue engineering: molecular mechanisms and scaffold innovations for enhanced regeneration
Bone tissue engineering (BTE) requires biomaterials that can replicate the extracellular matrix while supporting osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Collagen, especially type I, is central to BTE. Fish-derived collagen (FC) and hydroxyapatite (HAp) provide sustainable and biocompatible alternatives to mammalian sources, offering comparable structural and biological properties with reduced immunogenic risk. This review highlights recent progress, emphasizing quantitative benchmarks and mechanistic insights that distinguish fish-derived biomaterials from conventional counterparts. A systematic analysis of studies on fish collagen-based scaffolds, fish-derived bioceramics, coatings, and decellularized fish scales was conducted. Data on mechanical properties (compressive strength, elastic modulus), porosity, degradation profiles, and biological outcomes (osteogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation) were compared with existing mammalian-derived scaffolds. FC-based scaffolds demonstrated compressive strength of 2–5 MPa, elastic modulus of 50–150 MPa, and porosity of 60–90%, values within cancellous bone ranges. Degradation rates of 4–12 weeks aligned with bone remodeling. Decellularized fish scales exhibited superior stiffness (50–120 MPa) and hierarchical collagen–apatite architecture, supporting cell adhesion and VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. Fish bone–derived bioceramics showed controlled ion release, enhancing RUNX2 and BMP-2 expression. Compared to mammalian collagen, FC scaffolds exhibited improved osteoconductivity, tunable degradation, and lower immunogenicity. Fish-derived biomaterials provide quantifiable structural and biological advantages over conventional scaffolds, combining biomimetic architecture, osteoinductive signaling, and immunomodulatory effects. While challenges remain in mechanical reinforcement and clinical validation, evidence supports their translational potential, especially in composite and 3D-printed platforms for bone regeneration.
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
- Vol. 399 (6) , 7799-7834
Fish-derived biomaterials in bone tissue engineering: molecular mechanisms and scaffold innovations for enhanced regeneration
Bone tissue engineering (BTE) requires biomaterials that can replicate the extracellular matrix while supporting osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Collagen, especially type I, is central to BTE. Fish-derived collagen (FC) and hydroxyapatite (HAp) provide sustainable and biocompatible alternatives to mammalian sources, offering comparable structural and biological properties with reduced immunogenic risk. This review highlights recent progress, emphasizing quantitative benchmarks and mechanistic insights that distinguish fish-derived biomaterials from conventional counterparts. A systematic analysis of studies on fish collagen-based scaffolds, fish-derived bioceramics, coatings, and decellularized fish scales was conducted. Data on mechanical properties (compressive strength, elastic modulus), porosity, degradation profiles, and biological outcomes (osteogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation) were compared with existing mammalian-derived scaffolds. FC-based scaffolds demonstrated compressive strength of 2–5 MPa, elastic modulus of 50–150 MPa, and porosity of 60–90%, values within cancellous bone ranges. Degradation rates of 4–12 weeks aligned with bone remodeling. Decellularized fish scales exhibited superior stiffness (50–120 MPa) and hierarchical collagen–apatite architecture, supporting cell adhesion and VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. Fish bone–derived bioceramics showed controlled ion release, enhancing RUNX2 and BMP-2 expression. Compared to mammalian collagen, FC scaffolds exhibited improved osteoconductivity, tunable degradation, and lower immunogenicity. Fish-derived biomaterials provide quantifiable structural and biological advantages over conventional scaffolds, combining biomimetic architecture, osteoinductive signaling, and immunomodulatory effects. While challenges remain in mechanical reinforcement and clinical validation, evidence supports their translational potential, especially in composite and 3D-printed platforms for bone regeneration.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 26 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Regenerative Therapy
- Vol. 30, 278-298
Regenerative potential of PRP-based scaffolds in chronic wound healing: Mechanisms, advances, and therapeutic insights
- 26 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Regenerative Therapy
- Vol. 30, 278-298
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessRegenerative potential of PRP-based scaffolds in chronic wound healing: Mechanisms, advances, and therapeutic insights