Yuxi Pan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Yuxi Pan has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Guofei Deng
Scientific Research Center, Department of Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
2 shared publications - Shuo Fang
Department of Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
2 shared publications - Yusheng Luo
Scientific Research Center, Department of Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
2 shared publications - Jiancheng Wang
Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
1 shared publication - Shaoxuan He
School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
1 shared publication - Shuai Huang
School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 27 (4) , 2017
The Fibro-Immune Landscape Across Organs: A Single-Cell Comparative Study of Human Fibrotic Diseases
Fibrosis is a hallmark of the tumor microenvironment in many solid cancers, driving tumor progression, immune evasion, and treatment resistance; however, the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis—particularly stromal–immune crosstalk across organs—remain incompletely understood, compounded by organ-specific heterogeneity and a lack of reliable immune-related biomarkers. To address this, we performed an integrative single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of fibrotic tissues from four major organs—liver, lung, heart, and kidney—alongside non-fibrotic controls, applying unsupervised clustering, trajectory inference, cell–cell communication modeling, and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) to map the fibro-immune landscape. Our analysis revealed both conserved and organ-specific features: fibroblasts were the dominant extracellular matrix (ECM)-producing cells in liver and lung, whereas endothelial-derived stromal populations prevailed in heart and kidney. Immune profiling uncovered distinct infiltration patterns—macrophages displayed organ-specific polarization states; T cells were enriched for tissue-resident subsets in lung and mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells in liver; and B cells exhibited marked heterogeneity, including a pathogenic interferon-responsive subset prominent in pulmonary fibrosis. GSVA further identified divergent signaling programs across organs and lineages, including TGF-β/TNF-α in the heart, NOTCH/mTOR in the kidney, glycolysis/ROS in the lung, and KRAS/interferon pathways in the liver. Cell–cell communication analysis highlighted robust crosstalk between macrophages, T/B cells, and stromal cells mediated by collagen, laminin, and CXCL signaling axes. Together, this cross-organ atlas delineates a highly heterogeneous fibro-immune ecosystem in human fibrotic diseases, revealing shared mechanisms alongside organ-specific regulatory networks, with immediate translational implications for precision anti-fibrotic therapy, immunomodulatory drug repurposing, and the development of context-specific biomarkers for clinical stratification and therapeutic monitoring.
- 20 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 27 (4) , 2017
Open AccessThe Fibro-Immune Landscape Across Organs: A Single-Cell Comparative Study of Human Fibrotic Diseases
Fibrosis is a hallmark of the tumor microenvironment in many solid cancers, driving tumor progression, immune evasion, and treatment resistance; however, the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis—particularly stromal–immune crosstalk across organs—remain incompletely understood, compounded by organ-specific heterogeneity and a lack of reliable immune-related biomarkers. To address this, we performed an integrative single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of fibrotic tissues from four major organs—liver, lung, heart, and kidney—alongside non-fibrotic controls, applying unsupervised clustering, trajectory inference, cell–cell communication modeling, and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) to map the fibro-immune landscape. Our analysis revealed both conserved and organ-specific features: fibroblasts were the dominant extracellular matrix (ECM)-producing cells in liver and lung, whereas endothelial-derived stromal populations prevailed in heart and kidney. Immune profiling uncovered distinct infiltration patterns—macrophages displayed organ-specific polarization states; T cells were enriched for tissue-resident subsets in lung and mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells in liver; and B cells exhibited marked heterogeneity, including a pathogenic interferon-responsive subset prominent in pulmonary fibrosis. GSVA further identified divergent signaling programs across organs and lineages, including TGF-β/TNF-α in the heart, NOTCH/mTOR in the kidney, glycolysis/ROS in the lung, and KRAS/interferon pathways in the liver. Cell–cell communication analysis highlighted robust crosstalk between macrophages, T/B cells, and stromal cells mediated by collagen, laminin, and CXCL signaling axes. Together, this cross-organ atlas delineates a highly heterogeneous fibro-immune ecosystem in human fibrotic diseases, revealing shared mechanisms alongside organ-specific regulatory networks, with immediate translational implications for precision anti-fibrotic therapy, immunomodulatory drug repurposing, and the development of context-specific biomarkers for clinical stratification and therapeutic monitoring.
- Open Access
- 22 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1788
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Different Liver Fibrosis Models: Elucidating Molecular Distinctions and Commonalities
Background: Liver fibrosis, a consequence of various chronic liver diseases, is characterized by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM), leading to impaired liver function and potentially progressing to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. The molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis are complex and not fully understood. In vivo experiments are essential for studying the molecular mechanisms of the disease. However, the diverse principles behind mouse modeling techniques for liver fibrosis can complicate the elucidation of specific fibrotic mechanisms. Methods: Five distinct liver fibrosis models were utilized: CONTROL, NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis), BDL (bile duct ligation), TAA (thioacetamide), and CCl4 (carbon tetrachloride). Patents for these drugs were reviewed using Patentscope® and Worldwide Espacenet®. ScRNA-seq was performed to analyze and compare the cellular and molecular differences in these models. Results: The analysis revealed that, particularly in the drug-induced fibrosis models, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), Kupffer cells, and T-cell subsets exhibit distinct regulatory patterns and dynamic remodeling processes across different liver fibrosis models. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of immune responses and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in various models, providing important insights into the complex mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis. Conclusions: The study enhances our understanding of liver fibrosis development and provides valuable insights for selecting the most representative animal models in future research. This comprehensive analysis underscores the importance of model-specific immune responses and ECM remodeling in liver fibrosis.
- 22 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1788
Open AccessSingle-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Different Liver Fibrosis Models: Elucidating Molecular Distinctions and Commonalities
Background: Liver fibrosis, a consequence of various chronic liver diseases, is characterized by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM), leading to impaired liver function and potentially progressing to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. The molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis are complex and not fully understood. In vivo experiments are essential for studying the molecular mechanisms of the disease. However, the diverse principles behind mouse modeling techniques for liver fibrosis can complicate the elucidation of specific fibrotic mechanisms. Methods: Five distinct liver fibrosis models were utilized: CONTROL, NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis), BDL (bile duct ligation), TAA (thioacetamide), and CCl4 (carbon tetrachloride). Patents for these drugs were reviewed using Patentscope® and Worldwide Espacenet®. ScRNA-seq was performed to analyze and compare the cellular and molecular differences in these models. Results: The analysis revealed that, particularly in the drug-induced fibrosis models, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), Kupffer cells, and T-cell subsets exhibit distinct regulatory patterns and dynamic remodeling processes across different liver fibrosis models. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of immune responses and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in various models, providing important insights into the complex mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis. Conclusions: The study enhances our understanding of liver fibrosis development and provides valuable insights for selecting the most representative animal models in future research. This comprehensive analysis underscores the importance of model-specific immune responses and ECM remodeling in liver fibrosis.