BKBeate Kunze

Beate Kunze

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Beate Kunze has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Low-Dose Vitamin D3 Supplementation: Associations with Vertebral Fragility and Pedicle Screw Loosening

    by Jun Li, André Strahl, Beate Kunze, Stefan Krebs, Martin Stangenberg, Lennart Viezens, Patrick Strube, Marc Dreimann

    Background/Objectives: Vitamin D deficiency contributes to pathological vertebral fragility (path-VF), including fragility fractures and early pedicle screw loosening after posterior instrumented spinal fusion (PISF). Supplementation practices remain inconsistent. This retrospective study evaluated whether patients with path-VF receive appropriate vitamin D3 (Vit.D3) supplementation and assessed the dose–response relationship between daily intake and path-VF risk, particularly in older adults. Methods: A total of 210 patients treated with kyphoplasty or PISF (2022–2023) were classified into a path-VF or control group. Daily oral Vit.D3 intake was categorised as Zero- (0 IU), Low- (p < 0.001). Low-dose supplementation was associated with a markedly increased risk of path-VF compared with high-dose in the overall cohort (OR = 6.5, p = 0.003) and in patients aged ≥67.5 years (OR = 8.6, p = 0.008). Logistic regression identified a threshold of 1900 IU/day (AUC = 0.805). Mean vertebral HU values were significantly lower in the path-VF group than in controls (71.9 ± 29.1 vs. 133.5 ± 52.6, p < 0.001), and no consistent HU gains were observed with increasing Vit.D3 dosage. Conclusions: Low-dose Vit.D3 supplementation was associated with increased path-VF risk, especially in patients aged >67.5 years. Patients without path-VF had received significantly higher doses, suggesting broader benefits of adequate Vit.D3 beyond bone density. A daily intake above 1900 IU may serve as a practical threshold for at-risk elderly patients.


  • Open Access

    Ageing and BMI in Focus: Rethinking Risk Assessment for Vertebral Fragility and Pedicle Screw Loosening in Older Adults

    by Jun Li, André Strahl, Beate Kunze, Stefan Krebs, Martin Stangenberg, Lennart Viezens, Patrick Strube, Marc Dreimann

    Background/Objectives: Pathological vertebral fragility (path-VF) increases the risk of osteoporotic fractures and pedicle screw loosening (PSL) after posterior instrumented spinal fusion (PISF). While WHO body mass index (BMI) categories broadly identify risks related to underweight and obesity, fixed thresholds may inadequately reflect vertebral fragility risks among elderly patients, especially within the normal-weight range. This study investigates whether current BMI classifications sufficiently capture the risk of path-VF in older adults. Methods: This retrospective study included 225 patients who underwent kyphoplasty or PISF (2022–2023). Path-VF was defined by non-tumorous fractures, screw reinforcement, or PSL within six months without prior reinforcement. Patients were grouped into the path-VF (n = 94) and control (n = 131) groups. HU and BMI values, BMI-related ORs, and age trends were analysed, and a logistic regression was performed. Results: Mean HU values were significantly lower in the path-VF group (71.37 ± 30.50) than in controls (130.35 ± 52.53, p < 0.001). Path-VF females (26.26 ± 5.38) had a lower BMI than the control females (29.33 ± 5.98, p = 0.002); no difference was found in males. Normal-weight females showed a borderline risk for path-VF (OR 2.03, p = 0.0495). Obesity (ORmale 0.31/ORfemale 0.37) and being male and overweight (OR 0.21) were protective (all p < 0.05). BMI declined with age in path-VF males (p = 0.001) but increased in the controls (p = 0.023). A logistic regression identified a BMI < 22.5 kg/m2 and age > 67.5 years as significant risk thresholds. Notably, 20.2% of path-VF patients over 67.5 had a normal weight, suggesting a potentially overlooked subgroup. Conclusions: The current WHO lower limit for normal BMI (18.5 kg/m2) may underestimate the risk of path-VF in patients older than 67.5 years, potentially overlooking 24.7% of cases. The results offer a new approach for clinicians to interpret BMI values at the lower end of the normal range (2) with caution in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery.