Guobin Yang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Guobin Yang has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Juan Zhou
Yunnan Natural Disaster Prevention Technology Research and Development Center/Climate Change and Resource Utilization in Complex Terrain Regions Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province/School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China
1 shared publication - Jun Wen
The Plateau Atmosphere and Environment Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
1 shared publication - Sikai Liu
Climate Change and Resource Utilization in Complex Terrain Regions Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
1 shared publication - Xiao Li
Climate Change and Resource Utilization in Complex Terrain Regions Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
1 shared publication - Xing Li
Yunnan Natural Hazards Prevention Center/Climate Change and Resource Utilization in Complex Terrain Regions Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology
1 shared publication - Yangruixue Chen
Yunnan Natural Disaster Prevention Technology Research and Development Center/Climate Change and Resource Utilization in Complex Terrain Regions Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province/School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 30 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Atmosphere
- Vol. 16 (8) , 925
Performance of CMIP6 Models in Capturing Summer Maximum Temperature Variability over China
Previous research has primarily focused on assessing seasonal mean or annual extreme climate events, whereas intraseasonal variability in extreme climate has received comparatively little attention, despite its importance for understanding short-term climate dynamics and associated risks. This study evaluates the performance of nine climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) in reproducing summer maximum temperature (Tmax) variability across China during 1979–2014, with the variability defined as the standard deviation of daily Tmax anomalies for each summer. Results show that most CMIP6 models fail to reproduce the observed north–south gradient of Tmax variability with significant regional biases and limited agreement on temporal trends. The multi-model ensemble (MME) outperforms most individual models in terms of root-mean-square error and spatial correlation, but it still under-represents the observed temporal trends, especially over southeastern and central China. Taylor diagram analysis reveals that EC-Earth3, GISS-E2-1-G, IPSL-CM6A-LR, and the MME perform relatively well in capturing the spatial characteristics of Tmax variability, whereas MIROC6 shows the poorest performance. These findings highlight the persistent limitations in simulating intraseasonal Tmax variability and underscore the need for improved model representations of regional climate dynamics over China.
- 30 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Atmosphere
- Vol. 16 (8) , 925
Open AccessPerformance of CMIP6 Models in Capturing Summer Maximum Temperature Variability over China
Previous research has primarily focused on assessing seasonal mean or annual extreme climate events, whereas intraseasonal variability in extreme climate has received comparatively little attention, despite its importance for understanding short-term climate dynamics and associated risks. This study evaluates the performance of nine climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) in reproducing summer maximum temperature (Tmax) variability across China during 1979–2014, with the variability defined as the standard deviation of daily Tmax anomalies for each summer. Results show that most CMIP6 models fail to reproduce the observed north–south gradient of Tmax variability with significant regional biases and limited agreement on temporal trends. The multi-model ensemble (MME) outperforms most individual models in terms of root-mean-square error and spatial correlation, but it still under-represents the observed temporal trends, especially over southeastern and central China. Taylor diagram analysis reveals that EC-Earth3, GISS-E2-1-G, IPSL-CM6A-LR, and the MME perform relatively well in capturing the spatial characteristics of Tmax variability, whereas MIROC6 shows the poorest performance. These findings highlight the persistent limitations in simulating intraseasonal Tmax variability and underscore the need for improved model representations of regional climate dynamics over China.