Madalena Ponte
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Madalena Ponte has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Andrea Penna
University of Pavia
2 shared publicationsGabriele Guerrini
University of Pavia
2 shared publicationsRita Bento
CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa
2 shared publications- Andrea Penna
Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture University of Pavia Pavia Italy
1 shared publication - Elisa Rizzo Parisi
European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)
1 shared publication Elisa Rizzo-Parisi
European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 2 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1065-1074
Modeling Historical Aggregates Using the Equivalent-Frame Method: The National Palace of Sintra
- 2 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1065-1074
Modeling Historical Aggregates Using the Equivalent-Frame Method: The National Palace of Sintra
- 8 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1326-1336
Material Characterization of Composite Reinforced Mortars for the Retrofit of Masonry Walls
- 8 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1326-1336
Material Characterization of Composite Reinforced Mortars for the Retrofit of Masonry Walls
- Open Access
- 31 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 217-229
ERIES-RESTORING: REtrofitting of STOne MasonRy Using INnovative Grid-Based Composites
This paper discusses the effectiveness of Composite Reinforced Mortars (CRM) and Fiber-Reinforced Mortars (FRM) as seismic retrofit of existing stone masonry buildings. A large experimental campaign was conducted within the ERIES-RESTORING project, involving vertical compression, diagonal compression, and quasi-static cyclic tests. Undressed stone masonry specimens under different retrofit configurations, compatible with historical masonry, were studied: bare masonry, CRM applied on one side, CRM applied on two sides, and FRM applied on two sides. The CRM retrofit consisted of a glass-FRP mesh embedded in natural hydraulic-lime mortar and the FRM retrofit of a mortar with polymeric fibers. For the vertical and compression tests, three masonry wallettes were tested for each retrofit configuration, excluding the FRM that was not tested under this type of loading. Instead, for the testing of the in-plane cyclic behavior, full-size piers were subjected to a constant axial stress level and double-fixed boundary conditions. Two different pier aspect ratios were investigated to study the flexural and shear behavior. The FRM retrofit was tested only under quasi-static cyclic shear-compression loading and was applied directly to both sides of a single pier with an aspect ratio inducing flexural behavior. The experimental results, including damage mechanisms, lateral strength, and deformation capacity, can be referred to for calibrating advanced numerical models and conducting parametric studies on geometric, material, and loading conditions. Lastly, the outcomes of this project will contribute to the validation of analytical models and the development of design guidelines and code requirements for these retrofitting techniques on historical masonry.
- 31 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 217-229
Open AccessERIES-RESTORING: REtrofitting of STOne MasonRy Using INnovative Grid-Based Composites
This paper discusses the effectiveness of Composite Reinforced Mortars (CRM) and Fiber-Reinforced Mortars (FRM) as seismic retrofit of existing stone masonry buildings. A large experimental campaign was conducted within the ERIES-RESTORING project, involving vertical compression, diagonal compression, and quasi-static cyclic tests. Undressed stone masonry specimens under different retrofit configurations, compatible with historical masonry, were studied: bare masonry, CRM applied on one side, CRM applied on two sides, and FRM applied on two sides. The CRM retrofit consisted of a glass-FRP mesh embedded in natural hydraulic-lime mortar and the FRM retrofit of a mortar with polymeric fibers. For the vertical and compression tests, three masonry wallettes were tested for each retrofit configuration, excluding the FRM that was not tested under this type of loading. Instead, for the testing of the in-plane cyclic behavior, full-size piers were subjected to a constant axial stress level and double-fixed boundary conditions. Two different pier aspect ratios were investigated to study the flexural and shear behavior. The FRM retrofit was tested only under quasi-static cyclic shear-compression loading and was applied directly to both sides of a single pier with an aspect ratio inducing flexural behavior. The experimental results, including damage mechanisms, lateral strength, and deformation capacity, can be referred to for calibrating advanced numerical models and conducting parametric studies on geometric, material, and loading conditions. Lastly, the outcomes of this project will contribute to the validation of analytical models and the development of design guidelines and code requirements for these retrofitting techniques on historical masonry.