Edward Ager
Edward Ager has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adriana Rosato
Department of Medicine, Maine Health Institute for Research, Scarborough, ME 04074, USA
1 shared publication - Arjuna Vallabhaneni
HealthTrackRx, 1500 I-35 W, Denton, TX 76207, USA
1 shared publication - Barbara Alexander
Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
1 shared publication C.K. Wahl
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
1 shared publicationD. Chang
Department of Infectious Disease, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio TX, USA
1 shared publicationJ.L. Huss
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 15 (15) , 1939
Clinical Relevance of PCR Versus Culture in Urinary Tract Infections Diagnosis: Quantification Cycle as a Predictor of Bacterial Load
Background: Unambiguous clinical interpretation of PCR results for urinary tract infections (UTIs) remains a challenge. Here we compare and correlate multiplex qPCR results (quantification cycle values) with traditional microbial culture results (colony forming units) for clinical samples. Methods: Serial dilutions [108 to 100 colony forming units (CFU)/mL] were performed on five Gram-negative and two Gram-positive UTI-causing bacterial pathogens. For each dilution, quantitative cultures on solid media to confirm CFU/mL values and a real-time PCR UTI panel employing a nanofluidic Open ArrayTM platform producing quantification cycle (Cq) values were performed. Cq values were correlated with CFU/mL values, generating a semi-quantitative interpretive scale for clinical samples. The clinical utility of the scale was then assessed using PCR and culture data from 168 clinical urine samples. Results: For Gram-negative bacteria, Cq values of 28 corresponded with ≥105 CFU/mL, 5 CFU/mL and negative cultures, respectively. For Gram-positive bacteria, Cq values of 30 corresponded with ≥105 CFU/mL, 5 CFU/mL and negative cultures, respectively. Among 168 urine specimens (including 138 Gram-negative and 30 Gram-positive bacteria), there was 83.3% agreement (n = 140/168) and 16.6% non-agreement (n = 28/168) between culture CFU/mL and qPCR Cq. Gram-negative bacteria had higher agreement (87.6%, 121/138) than Gram-positive bacteria (63.3%, 19/30). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that qPCR Cq results can be directly correlated with traditional urine quantitative culture results and reliably identify the clinically relevant cutoff of 105 CFU/mL for detected uropathogens.
- 1 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 15 (15) , 1939
Open AccessClinical Relevance of PCR Versus Culture in Urinary Tract Infections Diagnosis: Quantification Cycle as a Predictor of Bacterial Load
Background: Unambiguous clinical interpretation of PCR results for urinary tract infections (UTIs) remains a challenge. Here we compare and correlate multiplex qPCR results (quantification cycle values) with traditional microbial culture results (colony forming units) for clinical samples. Methods: Serial dilutions [108 to 100 colony forming units (CFU)/mL] were performed on five Gram-negative and two Gram-positive UTI-causing bacterial pathogens. For each dilution, quantitative cultures on solid media to confirm CFU/mL values and a real-time PCR UTI panel employing a nanofluidic Open ArrayTM platform producing quantification cycle (Cq) values were performed. Cq values were correlated with CFU/mL values, generating a semi-quantitative interpretive scale for clinical samples. The clinical utility of the scale was then assessed using PCR and culture data from 168 clinical urine samples. Results: For Gram-negative bacteria, Cq values of 28 corresponded with ≥105 CFU/mL, 5 CFU/mL and negative cultures, respectively. For Gram-positive bacteria, Cq values of 30 corresponded with ≥105 CFU/mL, 5 CFU/mL and negative cultures, respectively. Among 168 urine specimens (including 138 Gram-negative and 30 Gram-positive bacteria), there was 83.3% agreement (n = 140/168) and 16.6% non-agreement (n = 28/168) between culture CFU/mL and qPCR Cq. Gram-negative bacteria had higher agreement (87.6%, 121/138) than Gram-positive bacteria (63.3%, 19/30). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that qPCR Cq results can be directly correlated with traditional urine quantitative culture results and reliably identify the clinically relevant cutoff of 105 CFU/mL for detected uropathogens.
- Open Access
- 1 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hospital Infection
- Vol. 120, 127-133
Initial Specimen Diversion Device® reduces blood culture contamination and vancomycin use in academic medical centre
- 1 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hospital Infection
- Vol. 120, 127-133
Open AccessInitial Specimen Diversion Device® reduces blood culture contamination and vancomycin use in academic medical centre