Lorena Giglio
Research Subjects
Lorena Giglio has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Carolina Reyes-Palomo
Departamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Madrid-Cádiz Km. 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
2 shared publications - Chiara Serena Soffiantini
Centro Ricerche Produzioni Animali-CRPA Soc. Cons. p. A., Viale Timavo 43/2, 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy
2 shared publications - Dagmara Łodyga
Department of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
2 shared publications - Paolo Ferrari
CRPA, Research Centre for Animal Production s.c.p.a., 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy
2 shared publications - Santos Sanz-Fernández
Departamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Madrid-Cádiz Km. 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
2 shared publications - Tine Rousing
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Postboks 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (3) , 1674
Correction: Giglio et al. Economic Resilience in Intensive and Extensive Pig Farming Systems. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7026
The authors would like to make the following correction to the published paper
- 6 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (3) , 1674
Open AccessCorrection: Giglio et al. Economic Resilience in Intensive and Extensive Pig Farming Systems. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7026
The authors would like to make the following correction to the published paper
- Open Access
- 2 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (15) , 7026
Economic Resilience in Intensive and Extensive Pig Farming Systems
European pig farmers are challenged by increasingly stringent EU regulations to protect the environment from pollution, to meet animal welfare standards and to make pig farming more sustainable. Economic sustainability is defined as the ability to achieve higher profits by respecting social and natural resources. This study is focused on the analysis of the economic resilience of intensive and extensive farming systems, based on data collected from 56 farms located in Denmark, Poland, Italy and Spain. Productive and economic performances of these farms are analyzed, and economic resilience is assessed through a survey including a selection of indicators, belonging to different themes: [i] resilience of resources, [ii] entrepreneurship, [iii] propensity to extensification. The qualitative data from the questionnaire allow for an exploration of how production systems relate to the three dimensions of resilience. Different levels of resilience were found and discussed for intensive and extensive farms. The findings suggest that intensive farms benefit from high standards and greater bargaining power within the supply chain. Extensive systems can achieve profitability through value-added strategies and generally display good resilience. Policies that support investment and risk reduction are essential for enhancing farm resilience and robustness, while strengthening farmer networks can improve adaptability.
- 2 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (15) , 7026
Open AccessEconomic Resilience in Intensive and Extensive Pig Farming Systems
European pig farmers are challenged by increasingly stringent EU regulations to protect the environment from pollution, to meet animal welfare standards and to make pig farming more sustainable. Economic sustainability is defined as the ability to achieve higher profits by respecting social and natural resources. This study is focused on the analysis of the economic resilience of intensive and extensive farming systems, based on data collected from 56 farms located in Denmark, Poland, Italy and Spain. Productive and economic performances of these farms are analyzed, and economic resilience is assessed through a survey including a selection of indicators, belonging to different themes: [i] resilience of resources, [ii] entrepreneurship, [iii] propensity to extensification. The qualitative data from the questionnaire allow for an exploration of how production systems relate to the three dimensions of resilience. Different levels of resilience were found and discussed for intensive and extensive farms. The findings suggest that intensive farms benefit from high standards and greater bargaining power within the supply chain. Extensive systems can achieve profitability through value-added strategies and generally display good resilience. Policies that support investment and risk reduction are essential for enhancing farm resilience and robustness, while strengthening farmer networks can improve adaptability.