Liceth Michelle Rodríguez Aguilar
Research Subjects
Liceth Michelle Rodríguez Aguilar has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alejandra Núñez-Venzor
Hospital General “Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez”, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
1 shared publication - Asya Zubillaga-Mares
Hospital General “Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez”, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
1 shared publication - Bertha Berthaúd-González
Hospital General de Zacatecas “Luz González Cosío”, Zacatecas 98160, Mexico
1 shared publication - Brandon Bautista-Becerril
Laboratorio de Neumogenómica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
1 shared publication - Edgar Abarca-Rojano
Sección de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
1 shared publication - Espiridión Ramos-Martínez
Unidad de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (15) , 5465
Systemic Inflammation Indices as Early Predictors of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis
Background/Objectives: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a highly variable inflammatory condition that can lead to severe complications and high mortality, particularly in its severe forms. Early risk stratification is essential; however, the delayed availability of traditional scoring systems often limits its effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of systemic inflammation indices as early predictors of severity in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted among patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis, classified according to the revised Atlanta criteria. Upon admission, systemic inflammation indices were calculated from complete blood count parameters, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI). Severity was assessed using the APACHE II score. Statistical analysis involved Kruskal–Wallis tests, Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, ROC curve analysis, logistic regression for odds ratios (ORs), and Spearman correlations. Results: SII, NLR, MLR, SIRI, and AISI showed statistically significant associations with AP severity (p < 0.05). MLR and SIRI exhibited the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.74). ORs for severe pancreatitis were: MLR = 19.10, SIRI = 7.50, NLR = 7.33, AISI = 5.12, and SII = 4.10. All four indices also demonstrated moderate positive correlations with APACHE II scores. Conclusions: Systemic inflammation indices are simple, cost-effective, and accessible tools that can aid in the early identification of patients at high risk for severe acute pancreatitis. Their integration into clinical practice may enhance early decision-making and improve patient outcomes.
- 4 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (15) , 5465
Open AccessSystemic Inflammation Indices as Early Predictors of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis
Background/Objectives: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a highly variable inflammatory condition that can lead to severe complications and high mortality, particularly in its severe forms. Early risk stratification is essential; however, the delayed availability of traditional scoring systems often limits its effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of systemic inflammation indices as early predictors of severity in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted among patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis, classified according to the revised Atlanta criteria. Upon admission, systemic inflammation indices were calculated from complete blood count parameters, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI). Severity was assessed using the APACHE II score. Statistical analysis involved Kruskal–Wallis tests, Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, ROC curve analysis, logistic regression for odds ratios (ORs), and Spearman correlations. Results: SII, NLR, MLR, SIRI, and AISI showed statistically significant associations with AP severity (p < 0.05). MLR and SIRI exhibited the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.74). ORs for severe pancreatitis were: MLR = 19.10, SIRI = 7.50, NLR = 7.33, AISI = 5.12, and SII = 4.10. All four indices also demonstrated moderate positive correlations with APACHE II scores. Conclusions: Systemic inflammation indices are simple, cost-effective, and accessible tools that can aid in the early identification of patients at high risk for severe acute pancreatitis. Their integration into clinical practice may enhance early decision-making and improve patient outcomes.