Angel Eduardo Pirela
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Angel Eduardo Pirela has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adriana Camacho
Centro de Investigaciones Odontológicas, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
1 shared publication - Camilo Durán Correa
Centro de Investigaciones Odontológicas, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
1 shared publication - Eddy Herrera Daza
Física Matemática, Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
1 shared publication - Gloria Cristina Moreno Abello
Centro de Investigaciones Odontológicas, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
1 shared publication - Lorenza María Jaramillo Gómez
Centro de Investigaciones Odontológicas, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
1 shared publication - Luz-Stella Rodríguez
Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia. Carrera 7 #, 40-62 Bogotá, Colombia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1925
Mechanically Induced Pulpitis: A Rat Model That Preserves Animal Well-Being
Background: Understanding the mechanisms underlying dental pain caused by pulpitis in humans has led to the development of animal models, such as the rat, which enable the study of the mechanisms underlying inflammation; the use of these models is considered ethically justified when the anticipated scientific benefits outweigh the potential impacts on animals in the harm/benefit balance. Objective: To develop a rat model of mechanically induced pulpitis and to evaluate the potential impact on animal well-being. Methods: Pulpitis was mechanically induced in male Lewis rats (13–16 weeks, 350–400 g) which were anesthetized and endotracheally intubated. Following pulp exposure, the cavity was sealed with either amalgam (n = 10) or zinc phosphate cement (n = 10). Following recovery and return to their housing, behavioral assessments and histological evaluations using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining were conducted in separate cohorts at two time points: 3 h and 5 days following the procedure. Results: A standardized model of mechanically induced pulpitis was established and verified clinically and by histopathological analysis, which showed evidence of the inflammatory process and revealed no statistically significant differences in the scoring of pain, discomfort, or distress, nor in the measurements of food and water consumption or body weight. Conclusions: The behavioral assessments conducted in this study supported the implementation of a safe and easily reproducible model for future research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms underlying pulp inflammation.
- 7 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1925
Open AccessMechanically Induced Pulpitis: A Rat Model That Preserves Animal Well-Being
Background: Understanding the mechanisms underlying dental pain caused by pulpitis in humans has led to the development of animal models, such as the rat, which enable the study of the mechanisms underlying inflammation; the use of these models is considered ethically justified when the anticipated scientific benefits outweigh the potential impacts on animals in the harm/benefit balance. Objective: To develop a rat model of mechanically induced pulpitis and to evaluate the potential impact on animal well-being. Methods: Pulpitis was mechanically induced in male Lewis rats (13–16 weeks, 350–400 g) which were anesthetized and endotracheally intubated. Following pulp exposure, the cavity was sealed with either amalgam (n = 10) or zinc phosphate cement (n = 10). Following recovery and return to their housing, behavioral assessments and histological evaluations using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining were conducted in separate cohorts at two time points: 3 h and 5 days following the procedure. Results: A standardized model of mechanically induced pulpitis was established and verified clinically and by histopathological analysis, which showed evidence of the inflammatory process and revealed no statistically significant differences in the scoring of pain, discomfort, or distress, nor in the measurements of food and water consumption or body weight. Conclusions: The behavioral assessments conducted in this study supported the implementation of a safe and easily reproducible model for future research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms underlying pulp inflammation.