Zaijing Gong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Zaijing Gong has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hashem Izadi Moud
Univ. of Florida
1 shared publication - Liujun Xu
School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
1 shared publication - Wei Wu
California State University, Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
1 shared publication - Yuanxin Zhang
Guangzhou Univ
1 shared publication - Zhihua Luo
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (24) , 13274
Ascertaining the Inconsistency of AEC Students’ Perceptions and Behaviors Regarding Sustainability by Mixed Methods
University students in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) are the main force and future leaders of the construction industry, and their values shape the model and direction of the industry’s future development. The construction industry is the largest contributor of waste and greenhouse gas emissions. However, there is an inconsistency between AEC university students’ perceptions and behaviors regarding sustainability, which has received little attention. This study attempts to shed light on the root causes of the inconsistency from the psychological perspective, incorporating construal level (CL) theory and psychological distance (PD) theory into situational settings of the experiment. We recruited 556 AEC students from 20 different universities to participate in data collection. Research findings revealed that PD has a significant influence on AEC students’ recycling behavior with variance in the effect of different dimensions, even though CL has no significant impact. Furthermore, findings show that spatial distance poses the greatest impact on AEC student recycling behavior, followed by information distance, temporal distance, experience distance, hypothetical distance, and social distance. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by introducing CL and PD into sustainability perception and behavior research in construction and has practical implications for universities with sustainability curricula in AEC.
- 16 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (24) , 13274
Open AccessAscertaining the Inconsistency of AEC Students’ Perceptions and Behaviors Regarding Sustainability by Mixed Methods
University students in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) are the main force and future leaders of the construction industry, and their values shape the model and direction of the industry’s future development. The construction industry is the largest contributor of waste and greenhouse gas emissions. However, there is an inconsistency between AEC university students’ perceptions and behaviors regarding sustainability, which has received little attention. This study attempts to shed light on the root causes of the inconsistency from the psychological perspective, incorporating construal level (CL) theory and psychological distance (PD) theory into situational settings of the experiment. We recruited 556 AEC students from 20 different universities to participate in data collection. Research findings revealed that PD has a significant influence on AEC students’ recycling behavior with variance in the effect of different dimensions, even though CL has no significant impact. Furthermore, findings show that spatial distance poses the greatest impact on AEC student recycling behavior, followed by information distance, temporal distance, experience distance, hypothetical distance, and social distance. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by introducing CL and PD into sustainability perception and behavior research in construction and has practical implications for universities with sustainability curricula in AEC.