Raushan S. Dosmagambetova
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Raushan S. Dosmagambetova has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexander Gulyayev
National Laboratory Astana, Center for Life Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2 shared publications - Kanat K. Tekebayev
RSE on the Right of Economic Management Scientific Research Institute of Balneology and Medical Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2 shared publications - Karlygash S. Absattarova
Department of Public Health, S. D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050012, Kazakhstan
2 shared publications - Madina Baurzhan
RSE on the Right of Economic Management Scientific Research Institute of Balneology and Medical Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2 shared publications - Sayagul A. Kairgeldina
RSE on the Right of Economic Management Scientific Research Institute of Balneology and Medical Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2 shared publications - Gaukhar Sh. Dauletova
Department of Public Health and Management, NJSC Astana Medical University, 33 Saryarka Ave., Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 31 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Advances in Respiratory Medicine
- Vol. 94 (2) , 22
Non-Pharmacological Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Pneumoconiosis: A Systematic Review
Background: Pneumoconiosis remains a major occupational lung disease associated with progressive respiratory impairment, reduced functional capacity, and diminished quality of life. Non-pharmacological rehabilitation has been increasingly proposed as a supportive intervention; however, evidence regarding its effectiveness remains heterogeneous. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize the available evidence on the effects of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions on functional capacity, quality of life, and psychological outcomes in patients with pneumoconiosis. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in major electronic databases and grey literature sources in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies evaluating non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in adults with pneumoconiosis were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included functional capacity, health-related quality of life, and psychological well-being. Due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Results: Six studies met the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The reviewed evidence suggests that structured rehabilitation interventions were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in functional capacity, particularly in structured rehabilitation programs, most consistently reflected by increases in six-minute walk distance exceeding established minimal clinically important differences in three studies. Improvements in health-related quality of life and selected psychological outcomes were also reported, although outcome measures and intervention protocols varied across studies. Significant improvements in exercise capacity, dyspnea severity, and health-related quality of life were reported. Conclusions: Non-pharmacological rehabilitation may provide clinically meaningful benefits for patients with pneumoconiosis, based on limited and heterogeneous evidence, particularly in terms of functional capacity and quality of life. Nevertheless, the current evidence base is limited by heterogeneity in study design and outcome reporting. Further high-quality, standardized trials are needed to strengthen the evidence and guide the clinical implementation of rehabilitation programs for occupational lung diseases.
- 31 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Advances in Respiratory Medicine
- Vol. 94 (2) , 22
Open AccessNon-Pharmacological Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Pneumoconiosis: A Systematic Review
Background: Pneumoconiosis remains a major occupational lung disease associated with progressive respiratory impairment, reduced functional capacity, and diminished quality of life. Non-pharmacological rehabilitation has been increasingly proposed as a supportive intervention; however, evidence regarding its effectiveness remains heterogeneous. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize the available evidence on the effects of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions on functional capacity, quality of life, and psychological outcomes in patients with pneumoconiosis. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in major electronic databases and grey literature sources in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies evaluating non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in adults with pneumoconiosis were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included functional capacity, health-related quality of life, and psychological well-being. Due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Results: Six studies met the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The reviewed evidence suggests that structured rehabilitation interventions were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in functional capacity, particularly in structured rehabilitation programs, most consistently reflected by increases in six-minute walk distance exceeding established minimal clinically important differences in three studies. Improvements in health-related quality of life and selected psychological outcomes were also reported, although outcome measures and intervention protocols varied across studies. Significant improvements in exercise capacity, dyspnea severity, and health-related quality of life were reported. Conclusions: Non-pharmacological rehabilitation may provide clinically meaningful benefits for patients with pneumoconiosis, based on limited and heterogeneous evidence, particularly in terms of functional capacity and quality of life. Nevertheless, the current evidence base is limited by heterogeneity in study design and outcome reporting. Further high-quality, standardized trials are needed to strengthen the evidence and guide the clinical implementation of rehabilitation programs for occupational lung diseases.
- Open Access
- 13 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Advances in Respiratory Medicine
- Vol. 93 (4) , 30
An Integrated Strategy for Preventing and Rehabilitating Dust-Induced Occupational Bronchopulmonary Diseases: A Scoping Review
Background: Occupational bronchopulmonary diseases (OBPDs)—including pneumoconiosis, silicosis, and occupational COPD—remain a pressing public health issue, especially in regions with intensive mining, metallurgy, and construction industries. Caused by chronic inhalation of fibrogenic dusts, these conditions are often diagnosed at late stages, resulting in irreversible lung damage and diminished work capacity. Methods: A scoping review was performed using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, with methodological refinements from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and gray literature for publications from 2014 to 2024. After screening 1761 records and full-text review, nine studies were included in the final synthesis, comprising two systematic reviews, two narrative literature reviews, and five observational studies. Results: Key risk factors identified included prolonged exposure to silica and coal dust, tobacco use, and genetic susceptibility. Diagnostic delays were attributed to the underuse of high-resolution CT and exhaled nitric oxide analysis. Several studies highlighted the diagnostic value of oxidative stress and inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6, TNF-α). Nutritional rehabilitation and polyphenol-enriched herbal therapies were associated with improved respiratory function and quality of life. However, these strategies remain underutilized, particularly in low-resource settings. Conclusions: A coordinated, biomarker-driven approach integrating early diagnosis, dust exposure control, and tailored rehabilitation is urgently needed. Multidisciplinary models may reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of OBPDs.
- 13 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Advances in Respiratory Medicine
- Vol. 93 (4) , 30
Open AccessAn Integrated Strategy for Preventing and Rehabilitating Dust-Induced Occupational Bronchopulmonary Diseases: A Scoping Review
Background: Occupational bronchopulmonary diseases (OBPDs)—including pneumoconiosis, silicosis, and occupational COPD—remain a pressing public health issue, especially in regions with intensive mining, metallurgy, and construction industries. Caused by chronic inhalation of fibrogenic dusts, these conditions are often diagnosed at late stages, resulting in irreversible lung damage and diminished work capacity. Methods: A scoping review was performed using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, with methodological refinements from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and gray literature for publications from 2014 to 2024. After screening 1761 records and full-text review, nine studies were included in the final synthesis, comprising two systematic reviews, two narrative literature reviews, and five observational studies. Results: Key risk factors identified included prolonged exposure to silica and coal dust, tobacco use, and genetic susceptibility. Diagnostic delays were attributed to the underuse of high-resolution CT and exhaled nitric oxide analysis. Several studies highlighted the diagnostic value of oxidative stress and inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6, TNF-α). Nutritional rehabilitation and polyphenol-enriched herbal therapies were associated with improved respiratory function and quality of life. However, these strategies remain underutilized, particularly in low-resource settings. Conclusions: A coordinated, biomarker-driven approach integrating early diagnosis, dust exposure control, and tailored rehabilitation is urgently needed. Multidisciplinary models may reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of OBPDs.