Kayleigh Yang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kayleigh Yang has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aleksander Dokollari
Cardiac Surgery Department, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
1 shared publication - Alexander J. Gregory
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, AB, Canada
1 shared publication - Ali Fatehi Hassanabad
Section of Cardiac Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, USA
1 shared publication - Alisha Ebrahim
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
1 shared publication - Amy N. Brown
Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
1 shared publication - Arzina Jaffer
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Medical Sciences
- Vol. 13 (3) , 128
Optimizing Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Clinical Outcomes
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, holistic perioperative recovery protocol intended to improve patient outcomes and decrease postoperative complication rates. While ERAS protocols were first introduced in 1997, specific guidelines for cardiac surgery were not established until 2019. Although the core principles of ERAS remain constant across surgical disciplines, ERAS guidelines for cardiac surgery have remained relatively understudied, likely due to the unique complexities posed by cardiac procedures. Within this comprehensive narrative review, we aimed to explore the current guidelines and evidence for ERAS in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. In non-cardiac surgeries, ERAS has been shown to improve various outcomes, including ICU length of stay, patient satisfaction, and pain management. ERAS for cardiac surgery has also shown encouraging results, including shorter ICU and hospital stays, reduced postoperative opioid use, and faster recovery times. However, there is limited consensus across studies, particularly regarding its impact on morbidity and mortality, with mixed results reported. Furthermore, the limited data on the efficacy of ERAS in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries makes it difficult to establish well-supported guidelines for these procedures. Despite its limitations, the overall outcomes of ERAS for cardiac surgery remain promising. As our understanding and application of ERAS in cardiac surgery continue to evolve, these protocols have the potential to redefine cardiac surgical care standards.
- 14 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Medical Sciences
- Vol. 13 (3) , 128
Open AccessOptimizing Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Clinical Outcomes
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, holistic perioperative recovery protocol intended to improve patient outcomes and decrease postoperative complication rates. While ERAS protocols were first introduced in 1997, specific guidelines for cardiac surgery were not established until 2019. Although the core principles of ERAS remain constant across surgical disciplines, ERAS guidelines for cardiac surgery have remained relatively understudied, likely due to the unique complexities posed by cardiac procedures. Within this comprehensive narrative review, we aimed to explore the current guidelines and evidence for ERAS in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. In non-cardiac surgeries, ERAS has been shown to improve various outcomes, including ICU length of stay, patient satisfaction, and pain management. ERAS for cardiac surgery has also shown encouraging results, including shorter ICU and hospital stays, reduced postoperative opioid use, and faster recovery times. However, there is limited consensus across studies, particularly regarding its impact on morbidity and mortality, with mixed results reported. Furthermore, the limited data on the efficacy of ERAS in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries makes it difficult to establish well-supported guidelines for these procedures. Despite its limitations, the overall outcomes of ERAS for cardiac surgery remain promising. As our understanding and application of ERAS in cardiac surgery continue to evolve, these protocols have the potential to redefine cardiac surgical care standards.