Camila Corti
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Camila Corti has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Facundo René Meroi Arcerito
Social Bee Research Center (CIAS), Institute for Research in Production, Health and Environment (IIPROSAM), Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, National University of Mar del Plata (UNMdP)
2 shared publications - María Belén Lezcano
Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM), CONICET-UNMdP, Centro de Asociación Simple CIC PBA, Mar del Plata 7600, Buenos Aires, Argentina
2 shared publications - Azucena Elizabeth Iglesias
Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata, CONICET, Centro de Asociación Simple CIC PBA, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina/Centro de Investigaciones en Abejas Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
1 shared publication - Darío Pablo Porrini
Museo de Ciencias Naturales “Lorenzo Scaglia”, Av. Libertad 3099, Mar del Plata 7600, Buenos Aires, Argentina
1 shared publication Facundo Ramos
1 shared publication- Facundo Ramos
Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM), CONICET-UNMdP, Centro de Asociación Simple CIC PBA, Mar del Plata 7600, Buenos Aires, Argentina
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Vol. 400
Effects of anti-hail netting on pollinator activity, fruit quality, and economic yield in kiwifruit
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Vol. 400
Effects of anti-hail netting on pollinator activity, fruit quality, and economic yield in kiwifruit
- Open Access
Kiwifruit Cross-Pollination Analysis: Characterisation of the Pollinator-Assemblage and Practices to Enhance Fruit Quality
Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) is a globally important crop presenting challenges for ensuring cross-pollination. This study aimed to (1) record the entomological fauna visiting flowers; (2) evaluate the visitation frequency of pollinators; and (3) test the use of lavender extract to enhance cross-pollination by honeybees and assess the impacts on fruit quality. Nine species of floral visitors were recorded as pollinators, although the most frequent were the exotic honeybee (Apis mellifera) and the native bees Bombus pauloensis and Xylocopa augusti. Honeybees increased their visitation to flowers when the attractant was used, improving pollination service and fruit quality compared to the control-bagged treatment, resulting in fruits that were 20 g heavier (115.4 g vs. 95.6 g, 95% CI). Similarly, the number of seeds per fruit and the fruit shape index (FSI) increased in treatments exposed to bee visitation when compared to the bagged control. However, differences in bee visitation among treatments suggested a non-linear relationship between bee activity and fruit quality. Nevertheless, achieving high-quality fruit standards across treatments could be explained by the extended floral lifespan, which allowed for a high number of visits and ensured pollination. Finally, we did not observe any bias in honeybee visitation by applying sugar syrup combined with the attractant. Hence, to increase honeybees’ visits to flowers, we recommend applying the scent directly in a water solution.
Open AccessKiwifruit Cross-Pollination Analysis: Characterisation of the Pollinator-Assemblage and Practices to Enhance Fruit Quality
Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) is a globally important crop presenting challenges for ensuring cross-pollination. This study aimed to (1) record the entomological fauna visiting flowers; (2) evaluate the visitation frequency of pollinators; and (3) test the use of lavender extract to enhance cross-pollination by honeybees and assess the impacts on fruit quality. Nine species of floral visitors were recorded as pollinators, although the most frequent were the exotic honeybee (Apis mellifera) and the native bees Bombus pauloensis and Xylocopa augusti. Honeybees increased their visitation to flowers when the attractant was used, improving pollination service and fruit quality compared to the control-bagged treatment, resulting in fruits that were 20 g heavier (115.4 g vs. 95.6 g, 95% CI). Similarly, the number of seeds per fruit and the fruit shape index (FSI) increased in treatments exposed to bee visitation when compared to the bagged control. However, differences in bee visitation among treatments suggested a non-linear relationship between bee activity and fruit quality. Nevertheless, achieving high-quality fruit standards across treatments could be explained by the extended floral lifespan, which allowed for a high number of visits and ensured pollination. Finally, we did not observe any bias in honeybee visitation by applying sugar syrup combined with the attractant. Hence, to increase honeybees’ visits to flowers, we recommend applying the scent directly in a water solution.