Alessandro Padella
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Alessandro Padella has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Massimiliano de Leoni
University of Padua
4 shared publications - Marwan Hassani
Eindhoven University of Technology
2 shared publications - Sjoerd van Straten
Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
2 shared publications - Fabrizio De Santis
University of Parma
1 shared publication - Francesco Vinci
University of Padua
1 shared publication - Francesco Zanichelli
University of Parma
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 11 November 2026
- Published by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd in International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
Process-Aware Event Log Augmentation for Process Prediction Under Labeled Data Scarcity
Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) forecasts future events of ongoing business processes based on event logs. However, deep learning approaches to PPM are often limited by labeled data scarcity and the low variability of real-world logs. To address this, we introduce SiamSA-PPM, a self-supervised framework combining Siamese learning with statistically grounded data augmentation. It employs novel transformation methods that leverage control-flow semantics and frequent behavioral patterns to generate realistic, semantically valid trace variants, learning generalizable prefix representations without labeled supervision. Extensive experiments on real-world event logs with a wide range of variability, incorporating exhaustive hyperparameter tuning, demonstrate the value of this process-aware augmentation. Compared to state-of-the-art baselines, SiamSA-PPM achieves competitive or superior predictive performance in both next activity and final outcome prediction tasks. An open-source implementation of our method is publicly available at https://github.com/SvStraten/SiamSA-PPM-IJCIS .
- 11 November 2026
- Published by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd in International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
Process-Aware Event Log Augmentation for Process Prediction Under Labeled Data Scarcity
Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) forecasts future events of ongoing business processes based on event logs. However, deep learning approaches to PPM are often limited by labeled data scarcity and the low variability of real-world logs. To address this, we introduce SiamSA-PPM, a self-supervised framework combining Siamese learning with statistically grounded data augmentation. It employs novel transformation methods that leverage control-flow semantics and frequent behavioral patterns to generate realistic, semantically valid trace variants, learning generalizable prefix representations without labeled supervision. Extensive experiments on real-world event logs with a wide range of variability, incorporating exhaustive hyperparameter tuning, demonstrate the value of this process-aware augmentation. Compared to state-of-the-art baselines, SiamSA-PPM achieves competitive or superior predictive performance in both next activity and final outcome prediction tasks. An open-source implementation of our method is publicly available at https://github.com/SvStraten/SiamSA-PPM-IJCIS .
- 27 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 369-387
Fairness in Prescriptive Process Analytics: Integrating Fairness Constraints into the Learning Phase
- 27 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 369-387
Fairness in Prescriptive Process Analytics: Integrating Fairness Constraints into the Learning Phase
- 8 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 70-87
Leveraging Data Augmentation and Siamese Learning for Predictive Process Monitoring
- 8 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 70-87
Leveraging Data Augmentation and Siamese Learning for Predictive Process Monitoring
- Open Access
Exploring LLM Features in Predictive Process Monitoring for Small-Scale Event-Logs
Predictive Process Monitoring is a branch of process mining that aims to predict the outcome of an ongoing process. Recently, it leveraged machine-and-deep learning architectures. In this paper, we extend our prior LLM-based Predictive Process Monitoring framework, which was initially focused on total time prediction via prompting. The extension consists of comprehensively evaluating its generality, semantic leverage, and reasoning mechanisms, also across multiple Key Performance Indicators. Empirical evaluations conducted on three distinct event logs and across the Key Performance Indicators of Total Time and Activity Occurrence prediction indicate that, in data-scarce settings with only 100 traces, the LLM surpasses the benchmark methods. Furthermore, the experiments also show that the LLM exploits both its embodied prior knowledge and the internal correlations among training traces. Finally, we examine the reasoning strategies employed by the model, demonstrating that the LLM does not merely replicate existing predictive methods but performs higher-order reasoning to generate the predictions.
Open AccessExploring LLM Features in Predictive Process Monitoring for Small-Scale Event-Logs
Predictive Process Monitoring is a branch of process mining that aims to predict the outcome of an ongoing process. Recently, it leveraged machine-and-deep learning architectures. In this paper, we extend our prior LLM-based Predictive Process Monitoring framework, which was initially focused on total time prediction via prompting. The extension consists of comprehensively evaluating its generality, semantic leverage, and reasoning mechanisms, also across multiple Key Performance Indicators. Empirical evaluations conducted on three distinct event logs and across the Key Performance Indicators of Total Time and Activity Occurrence prediction indicate that, in data-scarce settings with only 100 traces, the LLM surpasses the benchmark methods. Furthermore, the experiments also show that the LLM exploits both its embodied prior knowledge and the internal correlations among training traces. Finally, we examine the reasoning strategies employed by the model, demonstrating that the LLM does not merely replicate existing predictive methods but performs higher-order reasoning to generate the predictions.
- 30 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 200-215
Leveraging Counterfactuals for Prescriptive Process Analytics
- 30 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 200-215
Leveraging Counterfactuals for Prescriptive Process Analytics
- 27 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 274-290
Enhancing Predictive Process Monitoring on Small-Scale Event Logs Using LLMs
- 27 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 274-290
Enhancing Predictive Process Monitoring on Small-Scale Event Logs Using LLMs