Zhonghe Wang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Zhonghe Wang has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daleng Xin
School of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
1 shared publication - Julia Korosteleva
School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London, London, UK
1 shared publication - Jun Jin
School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
1 shared publication - Kehui Wang
School of Economics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
1 shared publication - Randolph Luca Bruno
School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London, London, UK
1 shared publication - Slavo Radosevic
School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London, London, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 October 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Review of Economics & Finance
- Vol. 112
Digitalization, trade-embodied carbon transfers, and heterogeneous environmental upgrading in global value chains: An input-output analysis in Europe
- 12 October 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Review of Economics & Finance
- Vol. 112
Open AccessDigitalization, trade-embodied carbon transfers, and heterogeneous environmental upgrading in global value chains: An input-output analysis in Europe
- Open Access
- 17 May 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Discover Sustainability
- Vol. 7 (1)
A critical evaluation of digitalisation and green measures for advancing twin transition metrics
The global economy has undergone two significant shifts in recent decades: digitalisation and the green transition. While each has been studied extensively, their intersection remains underexplored. This study reviews metrics for assessing digital and green transformations, both separately and jointly, and identifies key challenges in evaluating their complementarities and trade-offs. By mapping current approaches and offering a comprehensive framework, the paper highlights gaps. The paper proposes a theory-driven metrics framework to support integrated strategies for sustainable innovation and structural transformation toward a green and digital economy.
- 17 May 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Discover Sustainability
- Vol. 7 (1)
Open AccessA critical evaluation of digitalisation and green measures for advancing twin transition metrics
The global economy has undergone two significant shifts in recent decades: digitalisation and the green transition. While each has been studied extensively, their intersection remains underexplored. This study reviews metrics for assessing digital and green transformations, both separately and jointly, and identifies key challenges in evaluating their complementarities and trade-offs. By mapping current approaches and offering a comprehensive framework, the paper highlights gaps. The paper proposes a theory-driven metrics framework to support integrated strategies for sustainable innovation and structural transformation toward a green and digital economy.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (17) , 7896
Greening Through Recognition: Unveiling the Mechanisms of China’s High-Tech Enterprise Identification Policy on Sustainable Innovation
This study examines whether China’s high-tech enterprise identification policy promotes corporate sustainable innovation. Using panel data from Chinese listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2008 and 2022, we adopt a time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) model to evaluate the policy’s effectiveness and explore its underlying mechanisms. The results reveal that this certification policy significantly facilitates green innovation, and the findings remain robust across various checks, including alternative measurements, placebo tests, propensity score matching DID (PSM-DID), and the exclusion of digital transformation trend and confounding macro-level policies. Mechanism analysis shows that the policy influences green innovation by alleviating financing constraints, increasing access to government subsidies, facilitating the agglomeration of scientific and technological talent, and encouraging greater R&D investment. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the policy effect is more pronounced among non-state-owned enterprises, small-scale firms, capital-intensive businesses, those located in high-institutional-quality regions, and firms in China’s eastern provinces. Moreover, the positive impact is strongest for growth-stage firms. The policy has also been found to improve green innovation efficiency. These findings offer empirical insights for optimizing selective industrial policies to enhance sustainable innovation and support China’s dual-carbon goals.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (17) , 7896
Open AccessGreening Through Recognition: Unveiling the Mechanisms of China’s High-Tech Enterprise Identification Policy on Sustainable Innovation
This study examines whether China’s high-tech enterprise identification policy promotes corporate sustainable innovation. Using panel data from Chinese listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2008 and 2022, we adopt a time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) model to evaluate the policy’s effectiveness and explore its underlying mechanisms. The results reveal that this certification policy significantly facilitates green innovation, and the findings remain robust across various checks, including alternative measurements, placebo tests, propensity score matching DID (PSM-DID), and the exclusion of digital transformation trend and confounding macro-level policies. Mechanism analysis shows that the policy influences green innovation by alleviating financing constraints, increasing access to government subsidies, facilitating the agglomeration of scientific and technological talent, and encouraging greater R&D investment. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the policy effect is more pronounced among non-state-owned enterprises, small-scale firms, capital-intensive businesses, those located in high-institutional-quality regions, and firms in China’s eastern provinces. Moreover, the positive impact is strongest for growth-stage firms. The policy has also been found to improve green innovation efficiency. These findings offer empirical insights for optimizing selective industrial policies to enhance sustainable innovation and support China’s dual-carbon goals.