Minh Bao Kha
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Minh Bao Kha has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Tuan Linh Dang
Hanoi University of Science and Technology
3 shared publications - Binh An Nguyen
Hanoi University of Science and Technology
1 shared publication - Candice Yuen Yue Chan
Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd., Singapore 169857, Singapore
1 shared publication - Chi Trung Nguyen1 shared publication
- Darren Cheng Han Teo
Department of Infectious Diseases, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang E Wy, Singapore 544886, Singapore
1 shared publication - Duc Manh Dao1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 17 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
- Vol. 134
Integrating physics guidance into deep learning for cine cardiovascular segmentation
- 17 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
- Vol. 134
Integrating physics guidance into deep learning for cine cardiovascular segmentation
- 13 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
- Vol. 119
QaMatch: Adaptive semi-supervised learning for no-reference image quality assessment
- 13 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
- Vol. 119
QaMatch: Adaptive semi-supervised learning for no-reference image quality assessment
- Open Access
- 20 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (6) , 926
Can 3D T1 Post-Contrast MRI in A Radiomics-Machine Learning Model Distinguish Infective from Neoplastic Ring-Enhancing Brain Lesions? An Exploratory Study
Background/Objectives: Rapid and accurate classification of ring-enhancing brain lesions (REBLs) into infection or neoplasm is key to clinical triaging for expedited diagnostics in the former to enhance treatment outcomes, especially in the immunocompromised patients. High-resolution three-dimensional (3D) T1 post-contrast (T1+C) MRI provides high-dimensional volumetric data for radiomics analysis. While radiomics is useful in brain neoplasm characterization, its utility in central nervous system infection remains under-explored. In this exploratory study, we aim to determine if a radiomics-machine learning model, based solely on a 3D T1+C MRI dataset, can distinguish infective from neoplastic REBLs. Methods: 92 patients (infection, n = 26; neoplasm, n = 66) with 402 REBLs, who fulfilled criteria for “definite” or “probable” infective or neoplastic REBLs, were identified from scans performed at our hospital over four years and formed the training/validation dataset. All REBLs were manually annotated on T1+C MRI images under radiological supervision. In total, 1197 radiomics features were extracted, feature selection performed using mutual information, and nine machine learning classifiers applied to assess patient-level infection vs. neoplasm classification performance. End-to-end 2D CNN baselines and hybrid radiomics–CNN configurations were additionally evaluated under the same protocol for comparative benchmarking. Model performance was tested on an external holdout dataset of 57 patients (infection, n = 25; neoplasm, n = 32) with 454 REBLs from another hospital. Results: The Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) model using the Original + LoG + Wavelet feature group demonstrated superior performance. In the cross-validation cohort, it achieved a mean AUC of 0.80 ± 0.02, sensitivity of 0.83 ± 0.09, specificity of 0.77 ± 0.08, and balanced accuracy of 0.80 ± 0.02. On external holdout data, the same configuration showed stable and sustainable performance with an AUC of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.75, and balanced accuracy of 0.80. Conclusions: Our radiomics-machine learning model, based solely on a high-resolution 3D T1+C dataset, shows potential for distinguishing infective REBLs from neoplastic REBLs. Further study, with additional MR sequences and clinical data in a multimodal MRI radiomics-machine learning model, is warranted.
- 20 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (6) , 926
Open AccessCan 3D T1 Post-Contrast MRI in A Radiomics-Machine Learning Model Distinguish Infective from Neoplastic Ring-Enhancing Brain Lesions? An Exploratory Study
Background/Objectives: Rapid and accurate classification of ring-enhancing brain lesions (REBLs) into infection or neoplasm is key to clinical triaging for expedited diagnostics in the former to enhance treatment outcomes, especially in the immunocompromised patients. High-resolution three-dimensional (3D) T1 post-contrast (T1+C) MRI provides high-dimensional volumetric data for radiomics analysis. While radiomics is useful in brain neoplasm characterization, its utility in central nervous system infection remains under-explored. In this exploratory study, we aim to determine if a radiomics-machine learning model, based solely on a 3D T1+C MRI dataset, can distinguish infective from neoplastic REBLs. Methods: 92 patients (infection, n = 26; neoplasm, n = 66) with 402 REBLs, who fulfilled criteria for “definite” or “probable” infective or neoplastic REBLs, were identified from scans performed at our hospital over four years and formed the training/validation dataset. All REBLs were manually annotated on T1+C MRI images under radiological supervision. In total, 1197 radiomics features were extracted, feature selection performed using mutual information, and nine machine learning classifiers applied to assess patient-level infection vs. neoplasm classification performance. End-to-end 2D CNN baselines and hybrid radiomics–CNN configurations were additionally evaluated under the same protocol for comparative benchmarking. Model performance was tested on an external holdout dataset of 57 patients (infection, n = 25; neoplasm, n = 32) with 454 REBLs from another hospital. Results: The Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) model using the Original + LoG + Wavelet feature group demonstrated superior performance. In the cross-validation cohort, it achieved a mean AUC of 0.80 ± 0.02, sensitivity of 0.83 ± 0.09, specificity of 0.77 ± 0.08, and balanced accuracy of 0.80 ± 0.02. On external holdout data, the same configuration showed stable and sustainable performance with an AUC of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.75, and balanced accuracy of 0.80. Conclusions: Our radiomics-machine learning model, based solely on a high-resolution 3D T1+C dataset, shows potential for distinguishing infective REBLs from neoplastic REBLs. Further study, with additional MR sequences and clinical data in a multimodal MRI radiomics-machine learning model, is warranted.
- 25 August 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Pattern Recognition Letters
- Vol. 197, 282-287
UFR-GAN: A lightweight multi-degradation image restoration model
- 25 August 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Pattern Recognition Letters
- Vol. 197, 282-287
UFR-GAN: A lightweight multi-degradation image restoration model